Exin CDCS Dumps Questions Answers

EMF shieldingis most effective when installedclose to the source of the EMF, which in this case is thetransformer room. Shielding at the source contains the magnetic fields before they spread, minimizing exposure throughout the facility, including the computer room.

Detailed Explanation:

Placing shielding close to the EMF source minimizes the area impacted by electromagnetic interference, as it reduces the distance over which the EMF can spread. Shielding materials near the source can absorb or redirect EMF, providing the most effective reduction of EMF levels in adjacent spaces, like the data center.

EPI Data Center Specialist References:

EPI data center training advises positioning shielding close to the EMF source to contain fields more effectively and reduce interference in critical areas. This method is more efficient and cost-effective, as it limits the spread of EMF from the point of origin.

A potential disadvantage of using awater mist fire suppression systemis that it canrapidly increase the humiditywithin the data center, which may pose risks tosensitive electronic equipment. Excessive humidity can lead to condensation, which could damage electronics and leadto short circuits or corrosion over time.

Detailed Explanation:

Water mist systems use fine droplets to suppress fires by cooling and displacing heat. However, the moisture generated may raise the humidity level to the point where it exceeds safe operational limits for IT equipment. Therefore, while water mist systems are effective in fire suppression, they may not be ideal in environments where high humidity could damage sensitive equipment.

EPI Data Center Specialist References:

EPI guidelines advise considering the impact of humidity from fire suppression systems, particularly in environments housing electronic equipment. It’s essential to weigh the benefits of fire suppression against potential risks to operational equipment when choosing suppression methods.

Animbalance in load sharingbetween UPS systems connected in parallel can often result from unequalcable lengthsto the common busbar. If the cabling from each UPS to the busbar varies significantly in length, it can lead to differences in impedance, resulting in uneven load distribution. Ensuring that cable lengths are consistent helps to balance the load sharing across the UPS systems.

Detailed Explanation:

Parallel UPS systems rely on uniform impedance to share loads evenly. Differences in cable lengths cause variations in resistance, leading to one or more UPS units carrying a disproportionate share of the load. Standardizing cable lengths ensures equal impedance, which promotes balanced load sharing and prevents one UPS from being overburdened, thus maintaining overall system reliability.

EPI Data Center Specialist References:

EPI guidelines recommend checking cable lengths when load imbalances occur in parallel UPS configurations. Ensuring equal lengths is a common method to resolve impedance issues that affect load distribution, which is critical for the stable operation of redundant power systems.