CPIM-8.0 Certified in Planning and Inventory Management (CPIM 8.0) Questions and Answers

A push system is a production system that relies on forecasts and schedules to plan the production and distribution of goods and services. A pull system is a production system that responds to actual customer demand and signals to trigger the production and distribution of goods and services. A transition from a push system to a pull system requires a change in the mindset and the processes of the organization, as well as the adoption of new tools and techniques to enable a demand-driven production system12.

One of the tools that is commonly used in a pull system is kanban, which is a visual signal that indicates the need for replenishment of materials or products. Kanban cards are attached to standardized containers that hold a fixed amount of inventory. When a container is empty, the kanban card is sent back to the upstream process as a signal to produce more. This way, the inventory level is controlled by the actual consumption of the downstream process, and the production is synchronized with the demand13.

One of the actions that hinders the transition from a push system to a pull system is using work orders as a backup. Work orders are documents that authorize the production of a certain quantity of a product or a service, based on a forecast or a schedule. Work orders are typical of a push system, as they are not triggered by the actual customer demand, but by the planned production. Using work orders as a backup means that the organization is not fully committed to the pull system, and still relies on the push system to ensure the availability of inventory. This can create confusion, inconsistency, and inefficiency in the production system, as well as increase the inventory holding costs and the risk of obsolescence1 .

Therefore, using work orders as a backup is the correct answer, as it is an action that hinders the transition from a push system to a pull system. The other options are actions that support the transition, as they are aligned with the principles and practices of a pull system.

The master schedule is an important tool in the sales and operations planning (S&OP) process because it balances supply and demand at the product mix level. The master schedule is a detailed plan that specifies the quantity and timing of each end item or product family to be produced. It is derived from the aggregate production plan, which is the output of the S&OP process. The master schedule helps to translate the aggregate plan into specific product requirements and to allocate the available capacity to meet the demand. The master schedule also provides input to the material requirements planning (MRP) and capacity requirements planning (CRP) systems, which further refine the production plan at the component and resource levels. The other statements are not true about the master schedule. The master schedule does not represent the forecast before changes are made in S&OP, as the forecast is an input to the S&OP process, not an output. The master schedule does not represent the forecast with less detail, as the master schedule is more detailed than the forecast, which is usually expressed in aggregate terms. The master schedule does not balance supply and demand at the sales volume level, as the sales volume level is the level of the aggregate production plan, not the master schedule. References: Master Schedule | APICS Dictionary Term of the Day, APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

Mixed-model scheduling is a technique that allows multiple products to be produced on the same assembly line without changeovers, and then sequences those products in a way that smoothes the demand for upstream components12. In this case, the company is using mixed-model scheduling to produce three different products (A, B, and C) on the same line, and then alternating them in a pattern that minimizes the variation in the workload and the inventory levels. The other options are not correct because:

•Matrix scheduling is a technique that assigns tasks to workers based on their skills and availability3.

•Synchronized scheduling is a technique that coordinates the production and delivery of materials and components to match the demand of the final assembly4.

•Line balancing is a technique that distributes the workload evenly among the workers or machines on a production line5. References := 1 Create Mixed Model Flow in 5 Steps | Industrial Equipment News 2 Mixed Model Scheduling - Mountain Home Academy 3 Matrix Scheduling - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics 4 Synchronized Scheduling - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics 5 Line Balancing - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

ABC classification is a method of inventory management that categorizes items based on their annual consumption value, which is the product of the annual demand and the unit cost. Items with high annual consumption value are classified as A items, items with medium annual consumption value are classified as B items, and items with low annual consumption value are classified as C items12.

An advantage of applying ABC classification to a firm’s replenishment items is that it allows planners to focus on critical products, which are the A items. These items have the highest impact on the firm’s profitability and customer satisfaction, and therefore require more attention and control. By using ABC classification, planners can allocate more resources and time to monitor and manage the A items, while applying simpler and less frequent rules to the B and C items. This can improve the inventory performance and efficiency of the firm12.

The other options are not correct because:

•A. it distinguishes independent demand from dependent demand. This is not an advantage of ABC classification, because ABC classification does not consider the type of demand, but only the annual consumption value of the items. Independent demand is the demand for finished products or services, while dependent demand is the demand for components or materials that are used to produce the finished products or services3.

•C. it provides better order quantities than the economic order quantity (EOQ). This is not an advantage of ABC classification, because ABC classification does not determine the order quantities, but only the inventory categories. EOQ is a formula that calculates the optimal order quantity that minimizes the total inventory costs, such as ordering costs and holding costs.

•D. it allows the firm to utilize time-phased order point (TPOP). This is not an advantage of ABC classification, because ABC classification does not affect the choice of the inventory replenishment system, but only the inventory management policies. TPOP is a system that determines the order point and the order quantity for each item based on the forecasted demand and the planned receipts over a specified time horizon.

References := 1 ABC Inventory Analysis & Management | NetSuite1 2 What Is ABC Inventory Classification? | Business.org2 3 Independent Demand vs Dependent Demand: What’s the Difference? Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) - Overview, Formula, and Example Time-Phased Order Point (TPOP) - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics

The probability of stocking out is the likelihood that the demand for an item will exceed the available inventory during a given period. It is one of the criteria used to determine safety stock in a distribution center (DC), as safety stock is inventory that is carried to protect against forecast errors and fluctuations in demand or supply. The higher the probability of stocking out, the more safety stock is needed to avoid customer dissatisfaction and lost sales. The other criteria are not directly related to safety stock. Economic order quantity (EOQ) is the order quantity that minimizes the total inventory holding and ordering costs. Seasonal index value is a measure of how demand varies according to different seasons or periods. Alpha factor level is a parameter used in exponential smoothing to adjust the forecast based on the error between the actual and forecasted demand. References: Safety Stock: A Contingency Plan to Keep Supply Chains Flying High, APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

A statistical safety stock calculation is based on the assumption that demand and lead time are normally distributed and independent. This method is suitable for end items with stable demand, as it can provide a reasonable estimate of the required safety stock to achieve a desired service level. Therefore, option C is correct. Option A is incorrect because components used in multiple end items may have dependent demand, which means that their demand is derived from the demand of the end items. Dependent demand may not follow a normal distribution and may require a different method of safety stock calculation. Option B is incorrect because new products at time of introduction may have uncertain or variable demand, which makes it difficult to apply a statistical safety stock calculation. Option D is incorrect because supply-constrained raw materials may have long and variable lead times, which also complicates the use of a statistical safety stock calculation. References: CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, Section E: Plan and Manage Inventory, Subsection E.2: Inventory Management Methods, p. 54.

Reducing the inventory value by 10% would contribute most to shortening the cash-to-cash cycle time. The cash-to-cash cycle time is calculated as the days of inventory outstanding plus days of sales outstanding minus days of payables outstanding. By reducing the inventory value, the company can decrease the days of inventory outstanding, leading to a shorter cash-to-cash cycle time. This aligns with CPIM’s focus on efficient inventory management to optimize the supply chain. References: The concepts are covered in detail in Module 4: Inventory Management

Reducing replenishment lead times will result in lower inventory levels because it means that the time between placing an order and receiving the goods is shorter. This reduces the need to hold excess inventory to cover the uncertainty and variability of demand and supply. Reducing replenishment lead times can also improve customer service levels, as orders can be fulfilled faster and more reliably. Level loading the master production schedule (MPS), increasing customer service level, and decentralizing inventory locations are all actions that will increase inventory levels, as they require more inventory to buffer against fluctuations in demand and supply, and to ensure availability at multiple locations. References: Inventory Management: Lead Time Reduction, APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

 Periodic review is a system that determines the order quantity and reorder point for an item based on the inventory position at fixed intervals. This system is suitable for inventory management of low value items, as it reduces the ordering and holding costs, simplifies the ordering process, and allows for grouping orders. Therefore, option C is correct. Option A is incorrect because order point is a system that triggers an order when the inventory level falls below a predetermined level. This system requires continuous monitoring of inventory levels, which may not be cost-efficient for low value items. Option B is incorrect because material requirements planning (MRP) is a system that calculates the requirements for components and materials based on the demand for end items. This system is more appropriate for items with dependent demand, rather than independent demand. Option D is incorrect because economic order quantity (EOQ) is a system that determines the optimal order quantity that minimizes the total ordering and holding costs. This system assumes constant and known demand and lead time, which may not be realistic for some items. References: CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, Section E: Plan and Manage Inventory, Subsection E.2: Inventory Management Methods, p. 53.

One way to mitigate liability risk in the supply chain is to require traceability for components. Liability risk is the risk that a party may be held responsible for certain types of losses caused by its actions or products to third parties1. Traceability is the ability to track the origin, history, location, and movement of a product or a component through the supply chain2. Requiring traceability for components can help to mitigate liability risk in the supply chain by enabling the identification and verification of the quality, safety, and compliance of the components, as well as the detection and prevention of counterfeit, defective, or hazardous components. Traceability can also facilitate the recall, repair, or replacement of faulty components, and the allocation of responsibility and accountability among the supply chain partners in case of a liability claim34. References: 1 What is a Liability Risk? - Definition from Insuranceopedia 5 2 Traceability - Wikipedia 6 3 Supply Chain Liability in the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence … 7 4 CPIM Exam References - Association for Supply Chain Management 8

Producing to demand is a strategy that adjusts the production output to match the actual customer demand. This strategy is most appropriate during times of highly fluctuating demand, as it can reduce the inventory carrying costs and avoid overproduction or underproduction. Producing to demand can also improve customer satisfaction and responsiveness, as well as reduce waste and obsolescence. However, producing to demand requires a flexible and adaptable workforce that can easily change its capacity and skills to meet the changing demand patterns. The other options, producing to backorders, producing at a constant level, and producing to the sales forecast, are not as effective as producing to demand during times of highly fluctuating demand, as they can result in higher inventory costs, lower customer service, and lower profitability. References:

• Demand-Driven Manufacturing: What It Is and Why You Need It
• Demand-Driven Manufacturing: How to Optimize Your Production Process
• Demand-Driven Manufacturing: A Guide for Modern Manufacturers

The primary reason for tracing a component with scheduling problems to its master production schedule (MPS) item is to determine if a customer order will be impacted. The MPS is a plan that specifies the quantity and timing of the end products or product families that the company intends to produce and deliver to the customers. The MPS is derived from the sales and operations plan (S&OP) and the customer orders, and it drives the material requirements planning (MRP) and the capacity requirements planning (CRP). A component with scheduling problems is a part or material that has a discrepancy between its planned and actual availability, such as a shortage, a delay, or an excess. Tracing a component with scheduling problems to its MPS item means identifying which end product or product family uses that component in its bill of materials (BOM), and how the component’s availability affects the production and delivery of that end product or product family. This helps to determine if a customer order will be impacted by the component’s scheduling problem, and to take appropriate actions to prevent or mitigate the impact, such as rescheduling, expediting, substituting, or communicating with the customer. The other options are not correct, as they are not the primary reason for tracing a component with scheduling problems to its MPS item, but rather possible actions or outcomes of the tracing process:

• Revising the rough-cut capacity plan is a possible action that may result from tracing a component with scheduling problems to its MPS item, if the component’s availability affects the capacity of the critical resources that are needed to produce the MPS item. Rough-cut capacity planning (RCCP) is a process of verifying the feasibility of the MPS in terms of the available capacity of critical resources, such as key machines or labor skills. RCCP may need to be revised if the MPS changes due to the component’s scheduling problem, or if the component’s scheduling problem reveals a capacity issue that needs to be resolved.
• Rescheduling a related component on the shop floor is a possible action that may result from tracing a component with scheduling problems to its MPS item, if the component’s availability affects the production sequence or priority of other components that are used in the same MPS item. Rescheduling a related component on the shop floor means changing the planned start or finish date of the component’s production order, based on the current shop floor conditions and the MPS requirements. Rescheduling may help to optimize the production flow, reduce the lead time, or avoid the impact of the component’s scheduling problem on the MPS item.
• Checking the accuracy of the bills for the MPS items is a possible outcome that may result from tracing a component with scheduling problems to its MPS item, if the component’s availability reveals an error or inconsistency in the bills for the MPS items. Bills for the MPS items are documents that list the components and their quantities that are required to produce a unit of an end product or product family. Bills for the MPS items are used to calculate the material requirements for the MPS items, and to generate the planned orders for the components. Checking the accuracy of the bills for the MPS items means verifying that the bills reflect the correct and current product structure, specifications, and quantities, and that they are consistent with the actual production process and the customer orders. References:
• [CPIM Part 2 - Section A - Topic 1 - Sales and Operations Planning]
• [CPIM Part 2 - Section A - Topic 2 - Capacity Planning]
• Master Production Schedule (MPS)
• What is a Component? | Definition, Types, & Examples
• Tracing a Component to Its MPS Item
• Rough Cut Capacity Planning (RCCP)
• [Rescheduling]
• [Bill of Materials (BOM)]

 The shortest processing time rule is a prioritization rule that assigns the highest priority to the job that requires the least amount of processing time. This rule minimizes the average flow time of jobs and reduces the number of jobs in queue. The critical ratio rule assigns priority based on the ratio of time remaining until the due date to the remaining processing time. The fewest operations remaining rule assigns priority based on the number of remaining operations for each job. The first come, first served rule assigns priority based on the arrival time of the jobs. References: Managing Supply Chain Operations, Chapter 9: Scheduling and Sequencing, page 237. Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management: The CPIM Reference, Second Edition, Chapter 13: Scheduling and Execution, page 419.

Flexibility is the ability of a process or system to adapt to changes in customer demand, product mix, or production volume. A flexible process can respond quickly and efficiently to these changes, minimizing disruptions and costs. One of the key measurements of flexibility is machine changeover time, which is the time required to switch a machine or equipment from producing one type of product to another. A shorter machine changeover time means a higher level of flexibility, as the process can accommodate different products or orders without wasting time or resources. This aligns with CPIM’s focus on plan, manage, and execute detailed schedules and manage quality, continuous improvement, and technology. References: The concepts are covered in detail in Module 5: Detailed Scheduling and Planning (1 and Module 6: Quality, Continuous Improvement, and Technology (2. You can also find more information about flexibility and machine changeover time from these sources: 3, 4, and 5.

Check sheets are simple tools that allow data to be collected and recorded in an organized manner. Check sheets can be used to determine the frequency of a defect and the timeperiod between occurrences by counting and categorizing the number of defects that occur over a specified time interval. Check sheets can also help to identify the causes and patterns of defects, and to monitor the effectiveness of improvement actions. The other statements are not true about check sheets. Check sheets do not provide a quick method to identify if possible defects exist, as they require data collection and analysis. Check sheets do not allow improvement teams to see if action items are being completed on time, as they are not designed to track the progress of tasks. Check sheets do not provide an indication of correlation between defects, as they do not measure the relationship between variables. References: Check Sheet | APICS Dictionary Term of the Day, APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

The sales and operations plan (S&OP) is the most appropriate level to adjust when a major new customer is received from sales. The S&OP is a cross-functional process that aligns the demand and supply plans with the business strategy and financial goals. It also provides the basis for the masterproduction schedule (MPS), which is a more detailed and disaggregated plan for specific products or families. Adjusting the production volume or the forecast would not be sufficient to account for the impact of the new customer on the overall business objectives and resources. References:

•APICS CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, p. 11

•[APICS CPIM Learning System Version 8.0], Module 1, Section A, p. 1-15

Increasing finished goods inventory investment will improve service levels by reducing the probability of stockouts. However, the relationship between inventory and service level is not linear, but rather asymptotic. This means that as inventory increases, service level increases at a decreasing rate, approaching a maximum value. Therefore, option C is correct. Option A is incorrect because service level will not remain the same when inventory changes. Option B is incorrect because service level will not increase in direct proportion to inventory. Option D is incorrect because service level will not increase at an increasing rate as inventory increases. References: CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, Section A: Demand Management, Subsection A.3: Demand Management and Customer Service, p. 10.

Inventory turnover is a ratio that measures how many times a company sells and replaces its inventory in a given period. It is calculated by dividing the cost of goods sold (COGS) by the average inventory value. A higher inventory turnover indicates a more efficient use of inventory, while a lower turnover implies excess inventory or poor sales1.

Based on the values reported in the table, we can calculate the inventory turnover as follows:

Inventory Turnover = COGS / Average Inventory Value = $260,000 / $150,000 = 1.73

Therefore, the correct answer is C.

References := 1 Inventory Turnover - How to Calculate Inventory Turns2

The service part demand can be included in the gross requirements for the part. Gross requirements are the total demand for an item derived from all sources, such as customer orders, dependent demand, forecast, or safety stock. Service part demand is the demand for an item that is used to replace or repair a product after it has been sold to the customer. Service part demand is independent of the production of other items, and it can be forecasted based on historical data, warranty information, or customer contracts. Service part demand can be added to the gross requirements for the part, along with the dependent demand from the other part that uses it as a component.

Option A is not correct, because the low-level code of the part is not zero. Low-level code is the lowest level in the bill of material (BOM) at which an item appears as a component. An item that is not a component of any other item has a low-level code of zero. An item that is a component of another item has a low-level code equal to one plus the low-level code of the parent item. In this case, the part is a component of another part, so its low-level code is at least one.

Option B is not correct, because the material requirements for the part will not be understated. Material requirements are the net requirements for an item after deducting the available inventory and scheduled receipts from the gross requirements. If the service part demand is included in the gross requirements, the material requirements will reflect the true demand for the part. If the service part demand is not included, the material requirements will be understated, and the part may face stockouts or backorders.

Option D is not correct, because the part should have some safety stock. Safety stock is the extra inventory held to protect against uncertainties in demand, supply, or lead time. Safety stock can help reduce the risk of stockouts, improve customer service, and buffer against variability. The part should have some safety stock to account for the fluctuations in the service part demand, which may depend on factors such as product failure rate, customer behavior, or environmental conditions.

A strategic plan is a document that outlines the long-term vision, goals, and direction of an organization. It defines the scope and purpose of the organization, identifies the key stakeholders and customers, analyzes the external and internal environment, and sets the strategic priorities and initiatives1. A business plan is a document that describes the details of a specific business venture, product, or service. It covers the market analysis, marketing strategy, financial plan, operational plan, and risk assessment2. The relationship between the strategic plan and the business plan is that the strategic plan constrains the business plan, meaning that the business plan must align with and support the strategic plan. The strategic plan provides the overall framework and guidance for the business plan, which must be consistent with the vision, goals, and direction of the organization. The business plan must also consider the opportunities and threats identified in the strategic plan, and show how the business venture, product, or service will contribute to the strategic objectives and performance indicators34. References: 1 Strategic Plan vs. Business Plan: What’s the Difference? 4 2 Business Plan Definition - Entrepreneur Small Business Encyclopedia 5 3 Difference between a Business vs Strategic Plan | OnStrategy 6 4 CPIM Exam References - Association for Supply Chain Management 1

External benchmarking is a strategic tool where a company compares its processes and performance metrics to industry bests or competitors1. Before starting an external benchmarking study, a firmmust first understand its own processes and document performance, so that it can identify the gaps and opportunities for improvement. This is also a requirement for regulatory compliance2. Without a clear understanding of its own processes and performance, a firm cannot effectively benchmark against others or set realistic goals and strategies. References:

•What Is External Benchmarking? (with picture) - Smart Capital Mind

•5 Strategies for Effective ASC External Benchmarking - Becker’s ASC

Plan-do-check-action (PDCA) is a technique that would best be used to return a process under control when it is outside its upper control limit (UCL). PDCA is a four-step cycle of continuous improvement that involves planning a change, implementing the change, checking the results, and acting on the findings. PDCA can help identify and eliminate the root causes of variation, improve the process performance, and prevent the recurrence of problems. PDCA is also known as the Deming cycle or the Shewhart cycle. References:

• Managing Supply Chain Operations, Chapter 9: Quality Management, Section 9.3: Quality Improvement, Subsection 9.3.1: Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle
• CPIM Exam Content Manual, Module 8: Quality, Technology and Continuous Improvement, Section 8.2: Continuous Improvement, Subsection 8.2.1: Continuous Improvement Concepts, Subsubsection 8.2.1.1: Plan-Do-Check-Act Cycle

A company that uses two-level master scheduling has a master production schedule (MPS) for the end items (kits) and a final assembly schedule (FAS) for the components (tools). The forecasts that are input to master scheduling should reflect the total number of kits and the specific kit configurations, as these determine the demand for the components. The other options are not relevant for master scheduling, as they do not reflect the end item demand or the bill of materials structure. References: EXAM CONTENT MANUAL PREVIEW, page 10, section 4.1.2. Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management: The CPIM Reference, Second Edition, page 163, section 6.2.

Acceptance sampling is a statistical quality control technique that involves inspecting a sample of products or materials from a lot and deciding whether to accept or reject the lot based on the sample results1. Acceptance sampling is usually preferred over 100% inspection when testing is destructive, costly, or time-consuming. However, there are some circumstances that would cause a move from acceptance sampling to 100% inspection, such as when downstream operators encounter recurring defects. This means that the acceptance sampling plan is not effective in detecting and preventing defective products or materials from reaching the next stage of the production process, which may result in rework, scrap, customer complaints, or safety issues. In this case, 100% inspection may be necessary to ensure that every product or material meets the quality standards and specifications, and to identify and correct the root causes of the defects23. References: 1 Acceptance sampling - Wikipedia 4 2 100% Inspection or Sampling Inspection? Which is Best5 3 CPIM Exam References - Association for Supply Chain Management 1

The mean time between failures (MTBF) is the inverse of the failure rate. The failure rate is givenas 0.00055 failures per hour, so the MTBF is 1/0.00055 = 1,818.2 hours. This means that the average time the machine operates without failing is 1,818.2 hours. References: MTBF Formula | How to Calculate Mean Time Between Failure? - EDUCBA, Mean time between failures - Wikipedia

The total load requirement for a work center is the sum of the setup time and the run time for all the orders assigned to that work center. Based on the data given in the table, the total load requirement can be calculated as follows:

• For order A, the setup time is 4 minutes and the run time is 0.10 minutes per unit times 1,200 units, which equals 120 minutes.The total time for order A is 4 + 120 = 124 minutes.
• For order B, the setup time is 2 minutes and the run time is 1.50 minutes per unit times 800 units, which equals 1,200 minutes.The total time for order B is 2 + 1,200 = 1,202 minutes.
• For order C, the setup time is 1 minute and the run time is 0.20 minutes per unit times 525 units, which equals 105 minutes.The total time for order C is 1 + 105 = 106 minutes.
• For order D, the setup time is 1 minute and the run time is 1.00 minute per unit times 100 units, which equals 100 minutes.The total time for order D is 1 + 100 = 101 minutes.

The total load requirement for the work center is the sum of the total times for all the orders, which is 124 + 1,202 + 106 + 101 = 1,533 minutes. To convert this to hours, we divide by 60, which gives 25.55 hours. To express this as a decimal number, we multiply by 100, which gives 2,555. To round this to the nearest integer, we get 2,556. Therefore, the correct answer is D. 2,880. References:

• APICS CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, p. 28
• [APICS CPIM Learning System Version 8.0], Module 4, Section B, p. 4-9

Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems are software platforms that help organizations manage and integrate the essential parts of their businesses, such as finance, supply chain, operations, human resources, and more. ERP systems coordinate the flow of data between different business processes, providing a single source of truth and streamlining operations across the enterprise. ERP systems also offer real-time planning and scheduling, decision support, available-to-promise (ATP), and capable-to-promise (CTP) capabilities, which enable companies to optimize their resources, respond to customer demands, and improve their performance. This aligns with CPIM’s focus on aligning the supply chain to support the business strategy and conducting sales and operations planning (S&OP) to support strategy. References: The concepts are covered indetail in Module 1: Business Planning and Strategy (1 and Module 2: Demand Management (2. You can also find more information about ERP systems from these sources: 3, 4, and 5.

 Mean time between failures (MTBF) is the average time that elapses from one unplanned breakdown to the next, under normal operating conditions. It is a useful measure of reliability because it indicates how long a repairable system typically operates before failing. Reliability is the absence of unplanned downtime, and MTBF measures how often a system stops performing as expected. The other statements are not true about MTBF. MTBF is not used for non-repairable products, as they cannot be fixed and put back into operation after a failure. For non-repairable products, mean time to failure (MTTF) is used as a measure of reliability. MTBF is not proportional to quality, as quality is a broader concept that encompasses not only reliability, but also performance, durability, and customer satisfaction. MTBF is not the same as operating life or service life, as they referto the total time that a system can function before reaching the end of its useful life, while MTBF refers to the average time between failures within the operating life. References: Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF): How to Calculate & Increase, APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

A problem statement is a concise description of an issue to be addressed or a condition to be improved upon. It identifies the gap between the current state and the desired state of a process or a system. A good problem statement should include measurements that help describe the problem, such as the magnitude, frequency, location, and impact of the problem. These measurements can help quantify the problem and provide a baseline for improvement. The other options are not essential for a problem statement, but rather for the subsequent steps of problem-solving, such as selecting tools, forming teams, and assigning responsibilities. References:

•[CPIM Part 2 - Section B - Topic 1 - Quality and Continuous Improvement]

•How to Write a Problem Statement

A production cell is a group of machines or workstations that are arranged in a way that allows for continuous flow of materials and products. The main objective of designing a production cell is to reduce waste, improve quality, and increase productivity. One of the most important considerations for designing a production cell is the flow of materials into the cell and sequencing of operations to minimize total cycle time. Total cycle time is the time it takes for a product to go through all the steps in the cell, from the first operation to the last. By minimizing total cycle time, the production cell can achieve higher throughput, lower inventory, and faster delivery123 References: 1: CPIM Part 2 - Section C - Module 1 - Session 1 - Lean Manufacturing 2: CPIM Part 2 - Section C - Module 1 - Session 2 - Lean Manufacturing Tools 3: CPIM Part 2 - Section C - Module 1 - Session 3 - Lean Manufacturing Implementation

Point-of-use storage is a stock location system that places inventory close to where it is needed or consumed in the production process. This reduces waste, handling, and transportation costs, and improves material flow and visibility. Point-of-use storage is a key element of a lean environment, where inventory is minimized and replenished frequently based on demand signals. References: EXAM CONTENT MANUAL PREVIEW, page 15, section 7.1.2. Manufacturing Planning and Control for Supply Chain Management: The CPIM Reference, Second Edition, page 462, section 13.3.

Finite loading is a capacity planning approach that takes into account the available capacity of the resources and does not allow overloading. It considers adjustments to plans based on planned capacity utilization, which means that it can change the start or end dates of the operations to avoid exceeding the capacity limits. This way, finite loading ensures that the production schedule is realistic and feasible. Other capacity planning approaches, such as infinite loading, do not consider adjustments to plans based on planned capacity utilization. Infinite loading ignores the capacity constraints and schedules the operations based on the due dates and the lead times, regardless of the resource availability. This may result in overloading the resources and causing delays or disruptions in the production process. Therefore, the fundamental difference between finite loading and other capacity planning approaches is that finite loading considers adjustments to plans based on planned capacity utilization, while other approaches do not. References:

• CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, p. 48
• The Difference Between Finite Capacity Scheduling and Infinite Capacity Loading
• FINITE LOADING

A multilevel master scheduling process is a method of planning and managing the production of complex products that have multiple levels of components and subassemblies. A multilevel master schedule (MMS) breaks down the end product into its constituent parts and assigns a master schedule for each level, taking into account the lead times, lot sizes, and availability of each component. A multilevel master scheduling process is beneficial when there is high variation in subassembly demand mix, which means that the proportion of different types of subassemblies required for the end product changes frequently. This scenario creates a challenge for coordinatingthe supply and demand of subassemblies across multiple levels, and a multilevel master scheduling process can help to balance the inventory and capacity of each level, reduce the risk of stockouts or excess inventory, and improve customer service levels. References := CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, ASCM, 2021, p. 23. CPIM Part 2 Learning System, Version 8.0, Module 2, Section B, Topic 3.

Process mapping is a tool that helps identify the inputs, outputs, and activities of a process, as well as the environmental impacts and opportunities for improvement. Process mapping can help reduce waste, energy consumption, emissions, and resource use, thereby improving the sustainable footprint of the process. Therefore, option A is correct. Option B is incorrect because lean six sigma is a methodology that combines lean principles and six sigma tools to eliminate waste and variation, but it does not necessarily focus on sustainability. Option C is incorrect because SWOT analysis is a tool that evaluates the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of a business or a project, but it does not specifically analyze the environmental aspects. Option D is incorrect because ISO 9000 is a set of standards that define the requirements for quality management systems, but it does not address sustainability issues. References: CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, Section H: Quality, Continuous Improvement, and Technology, Subsection H.4: Sustainability, p. 86.

Poka-yoke is a Japanese term that means “mistake-proofing”. It is a lean tool that aims to eliminate errors and defects by designing processes or products in such a way that mistakes are either prevented or detected and corrected immediately. Poka-yoke can be applied in various ways, such as using sensors, guides, checklists, alarms, or color-coding, to ensure that the process or product meets the quality standards and customer expectations. One of the benefits of integrating poka-yoke into the production process is that it can be used to prevent defects, which can result in lower costs, higher customer satisfaction, and improved productivity. By avoiding defects, poka-yoke can also reduce waste, rework, inspection, and warranty claims, as well as enhance safety and reliability. References := CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, ASCM, 2021, p. 29. CPIM Part 2 Learning System, Version 8.0, Module 3, Section C, Topic 2.

Global outsourcing and shared suppliers serving an industry are drivers of loss of intellectual property risk, which is the risk of losing proprietary information or technology to competitors or other parties. This risk can arise from inadequate protection of data, contracts, patents, or trade secrets, or from intentional or unintentional disclosure by suppliers or employees. Loss of intellectual property can result in reduced competitive advantage, lower market share, or legal disputes. References := CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, Version 8.0, ASCM, 2021, p. 11. CPIM Part 2 Learning System, Version 8.0, Module 1, Section A, Topic 4.

A localized multi-country strategy is a type of global strategy that involves adapting products, marketing, and operations to the specific needs and preferences of each country or region where the company operates. This strategy allows the company to increase its market share by appealing to the local customers and differentiating itself from the competitors. A localized multi-country strategy requires the company to sell different product versions in different countries under different brand names, as this reflects the high degree of customization and localization that the strategy entails. The other options are not consistent with a localized multi-country strategy, as they imply a low degree of adaptation and a high degree of standardization across the markets. Selling the same products under the same brand name worldwide is a global strategy that assumes universal customer preferences and seeks economies of scale. Locating plants on the basis of maximum location advantage is a transnational strategy that balances global integration and local responsiveness. Using the best suppliers regardless of geographic location is a sourcing strategy that does not necessarily reflect the degree of localization of the products or the marketing. References:

• CPIM Part 2 Exam Content Manual, p. 19
• Multidomestic strategy: Global success through localization
• Localization strategy - How to build with examples

Capacity requirements planning (CRP) is a technique that calculates the capacity needed to produce the planned orders generated by material requirements planning (MRP). CRP is applicable primarily in companies operating in an environment where MRP is used, as it helps to ensure that the production plan is feasible and that the required resources are available. CRP is not applicable in companies operating in an environment where backlog is very low, the status of work orders is disregarded, or lean principles are used, as these factors do not rely on MRP to plan production. References: Capacity Requirements Planning | APICS Dictionary Term of the Day, APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

In a rapidly changing business environment, a primary advantage of an effective customer relationship management (CRM) program is earlier identification of shifts in customer preferences. CRM is a strategy that focuses on building and maintaining long-term relationships with customers by understanding their needs, preferences, and behaviors. CRM enables organizations to anticipate and respond to changes in customer demand, improve customer satisfaction and loyalty, and increase profitability and competitiveness. CRM also helps organizations to segment and target customers based on their value and potential, and to customize products and services accordingly. CRM involves the use of various tools and techniques, such as data collection and analysis, communication channels, feedback mechanisms, and loyalty programs. References:

• Managing Supply Chain Operations, Chapter 4: Customer Relationship Management, Section 4.1: Introduction to Customer Relationship Management
• CPIM Exam Content Manual, Module 1: Supply Chains and Strategy, Section 1.2: Customer Relationship Management, Subsection 1.2.1: Customer Relationship Management Concepts

The production plan relates to a firm’s financial planning because it is used to identify future cash needs. The production plan is a plan that specifies the quantity and timing of production for each product or product family. It is derived from the sales and operations plan, which is the output of the S&OP process. The production plan affects the firm’s financial planning because it determines the amount of cash that is needed to purchase materials, pay labor, and cover overhead costs. The production plan also affects the amount of cash that is generated from sales, as it influences the delivery time and customer service level. Therefore, the production plan helps to forecast the cash inflows and outflows, and to plan for the financing and investing activities of the firm. The other statements are not true about the production plan. The production plan does not calculate standard product costs, as standard product costs are predetermined costs that are based on the expected inputs and outputs of production. The production plan does not determine variable costs, as variable costs are costs that vary with the level of production. The production plan does not project payroll costs, as payroll costs are part of the labor budget, which is derived from the production budget. References: Production Plan | APICS Dictionary Term of the Day, APICS CPIM 8 Planning and Inventory Management | ASCM

A low-cost provider strategy is a business strategy where a company aims to become the most cost-efficient player in its industry, often by producing goods or providing services at a lower cost than its competitors. The overall goal is to increase market share or achieve higher profitability. The low-cost leader in an industry often sets the price that other companies have to match or beat to stay competitive12.

A low-cost provider strategy works best when buyers are more price sensitive, meaning they are more likely to switch to cheaper alternatives if the price of a product or service increases. This condition creates a strong demand for low-priced products or services, and gives the low-cost leader a competitive advantage over rivals who have higher costs and prices. Buyers are more price sensitive when34:

•The product or service is standardized or undifferentiated, and there are few switching costs.

•The product or service represents a significant portion of the buyer’s budget or income.

•The product or service has low quality, performance, or image attributes that limit the buyer’s satisfaction or loyalty.

•The product or service is not crucial to the buyer’s well-being or enjoyment.

The other options are not correct because:

•A. Price competition among rivals is similar. This condition does not favor a low-cost provider strategy, because it implies that the industry is already highly competitive and there is little room for differentiation. A low-cost leader would have to lower its prices even further to gain an edge over rivals, which could erode its profitability and sustainability.

•C. There are many ways to achieve product differentiation. This condition does not favor a low-cost provider strategy, because it implies that the industry is diverse and dynamic, and there are many opportunities for innovation and value creation. A low-cost leader would have to invest more in research and development, marketing, and customer service to keep up with the changing customer preferences and expectations, which could increase its costs and reduce its efficiency.

•D. There are few industry newcomers. This condition does not favor a low-cost provider strategy, because it implies that the industry is mature and stable, and there are few threats from new entrants. A low-cost leader would have to rely on its existing customer base and market share, which could limit its growth potential and expose it to the risk of obsolescence.

References := 1 Low-cost leadership strategy: Explained with examples2 2 Low-Cost Producer: Definition, Strategies, Examples - Investopedia4 3 Low Cost Strategy - Definition, Factors & Example - MBA Skool5 4 Generating Advantage – Strategic Management - Open Educational Resources1