L4M5 Commercial Negotiation Questions and Answers

MIL criteria indicate 3 limits that negotiator should establish:

M - Must achieve: minimum target/maximum you can concede on this point; the mandatory requirement or fall back position

I - Intend to achieve: realistic target you are aiming for on this point

L – Like to achieve: stretch target to achieve on this point.

PPCA is purchase cost analysis

TIMWOOD indicates 7 types of waste in Lean principles

The RAQSCI model is a mnemonic summary of a business model used to define and structure business requirements

Both organisational and personal power have the ability to influence the outcomes of negotiation. Good negotiators recognises the different sources of relative personal power they possess in a negotiation. There is no one superior source of personal power; they will vary in their effectiveness based on the situation. The more personal sources available the better, even if some not used, these can be used as a fallback.

LO 1, AC 1.3

Summarising what has been said is a key component of active listening, as it demonstrates understanding and engagement in the conversation. Active listening involves confirming and clarifying information, which helps build rapport and ensures accurate communication, as outlined in CIPS’s guidelines for effective negotiation communication.

Legitimate power in negotiation can arise from different sources:

Position power (authority from role/position in the organisation).

Referent power (influence from respect, charisma, or relationships).

A useful model of personal power that has survived the test of time and provide a simple way to analyse negotiation in French and Raven's Power Base Model, which describes six bases of power:

From a principled point of view, the focus of negotiation is on resolving the issue and not on winning temporary advantage over TOP through exploiting home advantage. From the principled point of view, the location and room layout should not be viewed as a source of tactical advantage and should not be used to try to gain advantage over TOP or unfairly influence them in the meeting room.

From a pragmatic point of view, not all of these elements in the ideal negotiation environment may be feasible, so the host may have to make compromises and explain these to TOP.

From a distributive point of view, the host will seek to create an advantage for themselves either explicitly or more subtly. It is arguable that any advantage gained through intentionally creating an uncomfortable environment to put short-term pressure on TOP is likely to be short-lived as TOP will likely reflect on this later and seek means to get even.

LO 2, AC 2.4

Distributive negotiation is often described as a "win-lose" approach, where each party aims to maximize their own gain, often at the expense of the other. The focus is onachieving personal success, not collaboration.

As negotiations near closure, skilled negotiators carefully observe for buying signals—verbal cues (“That sounds reasonable…”) and non-verbal cues (nodding, smiling, leaning forward). These indicate readiness to agree and confirm whether it is the right time to close. At this stage, both sides usually stop gathering data or building rapport, as the focus is on confirming alignment and avoiding last-minute derailments. Closing too early may risk missing concessions, but delaying risks cooling momentum. Recognising buying signals ensures closure occurs at the optimal point, aligning with preparation and tactical awareness.

The Win-Win approach is the most appropriate negotiation strategy in situations where collaboration and ongoing relationships are prioritized. In this case:

Achieving cost savings: The NHS aims to reduce expenses in order to reallocate funds to critical areas, making it essential that both parties work together to find cost-effective solutions.

Collaborative supplier relationship: Since Maria is working with a collaborative supplier, maintaining a positive relationship through mutual benefit is essential for continued cooperation.

Alignment with public service objectives: A Win-Win outcome aligns with the NHS's broader objectives of maximizing resources for patient care, as it ensures that savings are achieved without undermining the supplier’s commitment to quality service.

This approach aligns with CIPS guidelines for maintaining productive, ethical partnerships in procurement, especially in critical sectors like healthcare.

Using threats is generally inappropriate in strategic supplier negotiations where a long-term, trust-based relationship is required (C). Threatening tactics can damage the relationship and may result in resistance from the supplier. CIPS advocates for collaborative approaches in strategic relationships to foster mutual trust and achieve sustainable agreements.

Junior team members can play supportive roles in negotiations, such as taking notes and observing the proceedings. These roles allow them to learn and contribute without leading the negotiation. Serving as an expert or chair would typically require more experience and authority.

Supplier conditioning is the process of influencing a supplier or suppliers to behave in a certain way, or to accept certain circumstances. Within a negotiation, the buyer needs to make sure that the supplier has a number of messages in mind, about the outcomes that the buyer needs to achieve and about the shared sense of purpose that buying organisation has in achieving these outcomes.

Supplier appraisal is a process of evaluating a supplier's ability to carry out a contract in term of quality, delivery, price and other contributing factors.

Supplier positioning is the process of classifying spend with a supplier in terms of the profit potential and supply risk and assists in prioritising categories of spend and developing the right strategy.

Supplier selection is the process of selecting a supplier to acquire the necessary materials to support the outputs of organisations. Selection of the best and/or the most suitable suppliers is based on assessing supplier capabilities (Shih et al., 2004).

Variable pricing can lead to budgeting challenges and financial uncertainty over a 12-month period. While variable pricing may allow flexibility, it complicates financial planning and forecasting. For predictable budgeting and reduced financial risk, fixed pricing is typicallypreferred in such contract durations, aligning with CIPS recommendations on pricing models in contract management.

Published market indices are a source of macroeconomic data, as they reflect broader economic trends and provide insights into the overall market environment, which is essential for globalexpansion planning. Macroeconomic analysis focuses on high-level economic indicators, as recommended in CIPS’s guidelines on sourcing macroeconomic data.

A business negotiation agenda is a formal agreed upon list of goals to be achieved or items to be discussed in a particular order during a meeting or negotiation. Agendas can be formal and obvious, or informal and subtle in negotiations.

The agenda is one of the main structural elements of negotiation, in addition to such questions as site, identification of participants, and elements of timing. Together, they answer the who, what, when, and where questions. As with other aspects of negotiation, the agenda can be used either manipulatively to enhance leverage or to improve the prospects for agreement and the possibilities for mutual gain. In most cases, it will be used both ways, reflecting the nature of negotiation as a “mixed-motive” situation.

Although it can be instrumental to [research] volunteer as a sole source to write the agenda, in most cases it becomes a joint activity to construct a consensual basis for subsequent negotiation. In these situations, agenda-building becomes one of the pre-negotiation activities that set the tone for the relationship (Saunders, 1985). In other situations, the parties may engage in actual negotiation without a formal or written agenda. When this occurs, the risks and uncertainties may be high but the party who appreciates the importance of the informal agenda has a tremendous advantage.

Whether one plans it or not, during the course of negotiation the parties will discuss a finite set of issues in some sequence and from a particular perceptual framework. Consciousness of the universality and centrality of the agenda is prerequisite to guiding negotiation to a successful conclusion.

There are two major persuasion methods: 'push' and 'pull'.

Persuasion can be defined as encouraging someone to do something that you want them to do for you. Persuasion is reasoning with someone so that they will believe or do something they might not otherwise do. Persuasion can be considered as 'pushing' on TOP so that they can accept the change in attitude or behaviour as a result of your actions.

Influence is the ability to affect the manner of thinking of another. Influence can be considered as pulling on TOP so that you achieve the same result, but TOP feels they have changed their attitude or behaviour as a result of their reflection and thinking, and not your direct actions.

There are 5 options in this question:

'Threat of punishment, costs and damage': The influencer tries to 'push' the other party to act as he/she wants by using force. This method is effective but short-lived. The influencer also risks to developing reputation for being heavy handed and dictatorial.

'Argument based on information, logic and reason': The influencer uses logic and reasons to persuade the other party. This is also known as 'Persuasive Reasoning' (Push)

'Using language and imagery to ‘paint a picture others can see’': The influencer seeks to influence another by understanding the other's emotions, and stimulating that party's imagination to visualise the desired future goal of the influencer. This is also known as 'visionary (pull)'

'Working together to define the problem, the goals and the best solution': In this technique, the person seeking to influence another involves the other party in the decision making process. This is known as 'collaborative (pull)'

'Listening to, involving and supporting others': In this technique, the person seeking to influence another tries to discover the other party's emotion and aims at mutual understanding. This is also a collaborative approach.

Negotiating in the supplier's environment (their site) can unintentionally shift the power dynamic. The supplier may gain apsychological edgedue to the comfort and control of their surroundings. Best practice recommends holding negotiations in aneutral settingto ensure balance and reduce any influence based on physical context. While site visits are beneficial for supplier evaluation, they should beseparate from the negotiationto maintain objectivity.

At the proposing phase either side may start making tentative proposals regarding their offering. In the case of negotiation where TOP has already submitted a tender or proposal, this stage may provide an opportunity for them to make proposals to improve on their initial offers in general or in areas highlighted by the buying side in advance.

The word 'if' is very useful at this stage and allows you to test tentative proposals without committing yourself. Skilled negotiators use language very carefully. The questions with 'if' are hypothetical ones.

LO 3, AC 3.1

Zone of Potential Agreement (1) and Walk-away point (3) are key elements in negotiation planning. Establishing a Zone of Potential Agreement helps identify where interests align, whilethe Walk-away point sets the limit of acceptable terms. Both are essential to preparing a negotiation framework that benefits both parties, as per CIPS best practices.

Legitimate power derives from formal authority or position, giving the buyer leverage in negotiations. This power type is more effective in establishing credibility and enforcing terms, as highlighted in CIPS's framework for negotiation power sources, unlike informal sources like personality or friendship.

Commercial negotiations commonly take place during Contract Management and Improvement (1) and Contract Award and Implementation (4) stages. During these stages:

Contract Management and Improvement (1): Ongoing negotiations may be required to adjust terms and conditions as part of managing the contract lifecycle.

Contract Award and Implementation (4): Initial negotiations finalize terms, setting the foundation for successful contract execution.

These stages are pivotal in ensuring both initial and ongoing alignment, as outlined in the CIPS Procurement Cycle.

Fixed costs (FC) are costs that do not vary with volume. To an airline once aircraft are purchased, flight crews trained and departures scheduled, costs are disproportionately fixed.

Variable costs (VC) are those which vary with the amount produced. Fuel, catering services and marketing are examples of variable.

LO 2, AC 2.1

Professional buyers, when planning or engaging in negotiation with suppliers, should always be aware of where the intended and actual relationship with this supplier is positioned on the 'spectrum' or 'continuum' of commercial relationships. The relationship spectrum describes the range of commercial relationships between a buyer and supplier based on richness of communication, longevity and mutual dependence.

Timeline Description automatically generated

In the question, the contract is simple one-off (or spot buy), which means the relationship will likely to be more transactional. In such relationship, price is the most important criteria and buyer may adopt arm's-length approach.

Integrative negotiation seeks joint value creation. Collaboration builds trust and open exchange, while problem solving identifies creative tradeables that satisfy both sides. Coercion and risk transfer belong to adversarial, distributive strategies, where one side gains at the expense of the other. Persuasion can play a role, but without collaboration, it leans toward manipulation rather than true win-win. In practice, integrative approaches require willingness to share data, listen actively, and seek long-term alignment.

In the scenario, the main cost driver is suppliers' mark-up. The priority should be limit the margin to be added. XYZ Ltd can agree “cost plus” contracts with their suppliers to ensure no IT product purchased exceeds an agreed maximum margin level. Procurement teams can use their benchmarking tools to police these contracts. Cost plus contracts are agreements where the contractor's pricing is based on itemising allowable costs and then adding an agreed margin.

Market penetration pricing - pricing low to win a large share of the market

Market skimming - pricing a new product high in order to make a large profit from the purchases by initial customers. This is an effective strategy only in the absence of competition.When competition appears, market skimmers usually drop their prices

Premium pricing - usually pricing high because the market is prepared to pay extra for the kudos associated with the product, thanks to, say, a reputation for quality, or a highly fashionable brand name, and so on

Trust develops when organisations consistently deliver on commitments—meeting deadlines, respecting terms, and fulfilling promises. While audits, contract management, and data gathering support oversight, they do not in themselves build trust. In collaborative negotiations, reliability becomes the foundation of long-term partnerships, reducing the need for constant monitoring. CIPS highlights that trust is fragile and must be reinforced through transparency, consistent behaviour, and alignment of actions with words. This credibility is more persuasive than any formal monitoring.

The zone of possible agreement (ZOPA) or bargaining range is considered an area where two or more negotiating parties may find common ground. It is this area where parties will often compromise and strike a deal. In order for negotiating parties to find a settlement or reach an agreement, they must work towards a common goal and seek an area that incorporates at least some of each party's ideas.

The zone of proximal development refers to the difference between what a learner can do without help and what he or she can achieve with guidance and encouragement from a skilled partner.

There is no Walk away area. Walk away point is a position from which you cannot concede any more ground and must walk away/decline a deal.

Best alternative to a negotiated agreement is a fallback or backstop position if the negotiation fails to result in an agreement/no deal is agreed.

LO 1, AC 1.2

Procurement can negotiate various aspects of a purchase requisition even without a formal value analysis. While value analysis can enhance cost-effectiveness, procurement professionals often negotiate on pricing, terms, and conditions to add value independently of value analysis, as per CIPS’s guidelines on procurement flexibility in negotiations.

Skilled negotiators seek to understand the needs of the other parties, as well as their own. In doing so, it allows them to determine a strategy that their own needs are met. Failing tounderstand the other party's needs is one of the most common reason for an unsuccessful negotiation. In the commercial negotiation, procurement team does not negotiate with organisation, they negotiate with individuals. It is therefore important to recognise that there are two levels of needs:

The organisation - What the organisation wants to achieve. This is generally well stated and understood

The individual - what is in it for the individual? This is generally not stated, rarely discussed, but very motivational. It is vitally important therefore that time is invested in understanding the needs of the individual

Skilled negotiators are aware of the needs that occur at both levels, and develop creative options and strategies that attempt to satisfy these needs.

If driving greater value and efficiency from your supply base is your end, you should remember that there are many ways to do this without seeking to negotiate lower prices. Below are 7 types of saving levers:

An adversarial relationship is characterized by a competitive, often zero-sum approach where:

Minimal sharing of information (A): In adversarial settings, there is limited transparency as each party prioritizes its interests.

Use of power to seek the best possible deal (D): Power dynamics are leveraged to gain favorable terms, often at the expense of the other party.

This style typically lacks collaboration and mutual commitment, focusing instead on short-term gains rather than building a partnership, as described in CIPS resources on adversarial relationships.

“Expanding the pie” is a strategy used in integrative negotiations where both parties collaborate to increase the total value available before dividing it. This leads to mutual gains and supports long-term, strategic relationships.

In the scenario, the length of payment period is particularly important to the supplier as they are investing new facilities. Otherwise, the buyer's company has a positive cash flow position and budget is available for a shorter payment terms. So this tradeable (payment period) is important to supplier but it is not a significant problem with the buyer. This tradeable will fall within 'Easy concession to trade' quadrant in the following matrix:

Table Description automatically generated

If the tradeable fall within this quadrant, Sally should shorten the payment period in supplier's favour and try to win as many concessions as possible in return. Asking for a discount may be a reasonable trade-off.

LO 2, AC 2.3

Framing and re-framing (C) and Anchoring (E) are powerful influencing techniques:

Framing and re-framing (C): This technique shapes how information is presented to make specific aspects more compelling or relevant.

Anchoring (E): Anchoring sets an initial reference point, which influences how subsequent information is perceived.

These techniques help negotiators control the flow and focus of discussions, aligning with CIPS recommendations for strategic influence in negotiations.

Conflict can arise in procurement negotiations due to a power imbalance, which occurs when one party has more influence than the other, leading to potential exploitation or dissatisfaction. Differences in goals between parties—such as cost minimization for buyers and profit maximization for suppliers—also contribute to tension. Surprisingly, similar motives can lead to conflict as well, particularly when both parties are competing for limited benefits or market share.

There are several pricing strategies used by suppliers:

Cost-plus pricing – Total variable + Fixed cost + profit

Premium pricing – based on branding. Supplier determines to charge a very high price, not connected with cost structures, usually based on its reputation and/or the perception that the product/service is of

a superior quality. This strategy typically found in the early part of the product life cycle/when demand exceeds supply.

Penetration pricing - Supplier attempts to enter a new market or extend its share in an established one. It is characterised by price reductions to increase volume, followed by steady price increases; may

even be loss leading at start (no profit made)

Marginal cost pricing – covers only variable cost

Market pricing – suppliers prices in line with what the market is willing to pay

The case in the question is illustrated as below:

The equilibrium price initially at P0 with quantity Q0, when supply curve shifts to the left, it will converge with demand curve at new equilibrium point with price P1 and quantity Q1. As you can see from the graph, P1 is greater than P0 and Q1 is smaller than Q0.

A collaborative negotiation approach is explicitly designed to achieve win–win outcomes, where both parties work together to maximise joint value. This approach is closely associated with integrative negotiation, emphasising trust, information sharing, and joint problem-solving. Distributive and adversarial approaches are win–lose, focusing on dividing value rather than creating it. “Collective” is not a recognised CIPS negotiation approach. Collaborative negotiation is particularly suitable where long-term relationships, shared objectives, or strategic partnerships are important.

The typical stages of commercial negotiation are Preparing, opening, bargaining, agreement, and closure. This sequence facilitates a structured approach where negotiators prepare strategies, initiate discussions, engage in bargaining, reach agreements, and formally close the negotiation. This structure is emphasized in CIPS materials as essential for achieving a balanced negotiation process.

Hearing is passive but listening is active, and some people need to learn to be a good, attentive listener. The following rules of attentive listening will help you to become a successful negotiator:

• Be motivated to listen

• Be alert to non-verbal cues

• Do not interrupt the other party when they are speaking

• Fight off distractions

• Write everything down

• Listen with a goal in mind

• Give the other party your undivided attention

• React to the message, not the person

LO 3, AC 3.3

The question requires student to detect factors of cultural differences. Problems may occur on the international scene with such things as the importance of extending courtesy between cultures, the importance of timescales, the use of negotiating ploys, the sense of ‘fair play', the use and interpretation of body language, the role of women in negotiations (or indeed, in business in general), the importance of status, the role of conflict, standards of dress and deportment and the readiness to ignore or uphold contract terms and conditions.

LO 3, AC 3.3

Trust-destroying behaviours:

- Rumours of partnership or relationship breaking down

- Emotion-based assessment of performance

- Avoiding accountability, passing the blame to others

- General mood – resentment, distrust, frustration, etc

LO 1, AC 1.4

Hypothetical questions are used to explore options or scenarios without making commitments. This technique allows negotiators to understand the other party’s preferences and limitations by presenting hypothetical situations, as recommended in CIPS guidelines for negotiation questioning techniques.

In the scenario, to exchange cost cutting, the purchasing manager promises to 'reward' supplier shorter payment period. This is an example of reward power, which results from one person's ability to

compensate or reward another for compliance.

The reward does not need to be money, but could be introduction to other buyers in the group, positive references, agreement to trial new product, quicker payment or indeed any other variable that the buyer

knows is attractive and valued by the supplier.

Commercial negotiations involve a wider set of stakeholders than procurement, budget holders, and users. Depending on context, directors, IT specialists, legal teams, regulators, or external partners may all be impacted. Ignoring them risks resistance or missed requirements. CIPS stresses stakeholder mapping tools (such as Mendelow’s Matrix) to identify influence and interest levels, ensuring all relevant parties are managed appropriately in negotiation preparation and execution. Narrow stakeholder identification can undermine outcomes.

Integrative negotiation emphasises maximising joint outcomes and pursuing shared goals, moving beyond narrow self-interest. Unlike distributive negotiations, it does not focus on short-term wins or zero-sum positions. Instead, integrative strategies build sustainable value and strengthen partnerships. Maximising the other party’s outcome alone is more accommodative than integrative. Therefore, true integrative practice balances both parties’ interests for long-term gain.

Integrative negotiation is a negotiation strategy in which the involved parties work together to find a solution that satisfies the needs and concerns of each. This process often involves group brainstorming and creative thinking for individuals to suggest different ideas that benefit both parties.

Compromising is often common in integrative negotiation, and both sides may need to give up certain needs to reach a solution. Honesty can also promote successful integrative negotiation because it can lead to a comprehensive understanding of the issue and what each party needs to be satisfied with the result.

Setting the contract currency to the buyer’s currency transfers FX exposure to the supplier. The buyer gains price certainty in GBP, although the supplier may price in a risk premium—a common application decision when negotiating internationally.

The question requires more detailed answer, it is an example of probing question.

Probing questions are typically follow-up questions, and aim to elicit more detailed information on the back of the answer elicited from the open questions. Probing question are also useful to check that the supplier fully understand their offering, as well as your needs, can also be used to communicate to the suppliers that you know this category well.

LO 3, AC 3.3

Open questions begin with “how,” “what,” “why,” etc., and are designed to encourage detailed responses. The supplier’s questions are open-ended and aim to gather comprehensive feedback, which can inform better mutual understanding and potential deal improvements.

Becoming a preferred customer to supplier's perspective can increase the purchaser's leverage in negotiation. Beside the size of buying organisation or its spend, the following may be sufficient to differentiate the buyer from other buying organisations:

Simple procurement processes: Using SRM technology may help to simplify the process

Simple contracting processes

Clear and concise documentation: Reduced paperwork helps both supplier and buyer save their time and resources.

Absence of onerous supplier terms and conditions

On-time payment

Transparent processes: Unclear tender award criteria can be seen as opaque. Suppliers who attended the tendering processes cannot know the reasons why their bids are rejected and hesitate to attend other tendering.

Ethical behaviour: Suppliers may prefer a buyer who adopts CSR policy because they can predict potential customer's behaviour. Demands for kickback are unethical behaviours.

According to Paul Steele's 'The Seller's Perspective', customer can be classified into 4 categories as below:

To increase the leverage in negotiation, buyer may increase its attractiveness and/or increase spend value. In this scenario, the buyer is already attractive to supplier as it always pays on-time, but the spend is still low. So to have greater leverage, the buyer has to increase its spend volume by spend concentration. Spend concentration may take many forms as following:

- Vendor base reduction

- Volume pooling

- Volume redistribution

- Volume consolidation across categories

- Standardisation and harmonisation of specifications

- Forming purchasing consortia

LO 1, AC 1.3

Different questioning styles can be used to elicit desired responses:

Text Description automatically generated

In 1959, French and Raven described five bases of power:

1. Legitimate – This comes from the belief that a person has the formal right to make demands, and to expect others to be compliant and obedient.

2. Reward – This results from one person's ability to compensate another for compliance.

3. Expert – This is based on a person's high levels of skill and knowledge.

4. Referent – This is the result of a person's perceived attractiveness, worthiness and right to others' respect.

5. Coercive – This comes from the belief that a person can punish others for noncompliance.

Six years later, Raven added an extra power base:

6. Informational – This results from a person's ability to control the information that others need to accomplish something.

In the scenario, Neville attracts and keeps good relationship with his colleagues not because of neither position nor reward nor coercion. He has good skills and kindness, which increase his charisma. His source of power is referent power.

Integrative negotiation relies on openness and trust, aiming to identify underlying interests, not just positions. Withholding information is typical of distributive (win-lose) bargaining, where each side protects its bottom line. In an integrative context, hiding key details prevents mutual understanding, reduces creative option-building, and damages relationship trust. Instead, transparency enables value creation—such as joint cost reduction or innovation. CIPS emphasises that power must be balanced with openness when integrative outcomes are desired.

BATNA (Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement) is a core preparation concept and should always be considered before negotiations begin. It gives the buyer clarity on the minimum acceptable outcome and provides leverage by ensuring they do not accept a deal worse than their alternative. BATNA is not a legal requirement, nor should it be developed only when negotiations fail, as this weakens negotiating confidence and decision-making. CIPS emphasises BATNA as a fundamental planning tool that underpins effective and disciplined negotiation behaviour.

Connected stakeholders are those who, by contractual or commercial relationships, have a significant stake in organisation activity. As a general rule, connected stakeholder (with the exception of suppliers) have a low level of influence on procurement negotiations.

Examples of connected stakeholders are: suppliers, customers, bank where the organisation opens its account, shareholders.

Macroeconomic indicators are statistics or data readings that reflect the economic circumstances of a particular country, region or sector. They are used by analysts and governments to assess the current and future health of the economy and financial markets.

Macroeconomic indicators will vary in their meaning and the impact that they have on the economy, but broadly speaking there are two main types of indicator.

- Leading indicators, which forecast where an economy might be heading. They are often used by governments to implement policies because they represent the first phase of a new economic cycle. These include the yield curve, interest rates and share prices.

- Lagging indicators, which reflect an economy’s historical performance and only change after a trend has been established. They are used to confirm a trend is underway. These include gross domestic product (GDP), inflation and employment figures.

There is also the category of coincident indicators, but these are generally grouped in with lagging indicators as they either happen at the same time or after an economic shift.

The best macroeconomic indicator to watch will heavily depend on your personal preferences, what positions you are taking and which country your portfolio is focused on. However, there are some very common indicators that most traders and investors will keep an eye on.

For simplicity’s sake, we have split these out into leading and lagging indicators.

Top leading indicators:

1. The stock market

2. House prices

3. Bond yields

4. Production and manufacturing statistics

5. Retail sales

6. Interest rates

Top lagging indicators:

1. GDP growth rates

2. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) and inflation

3. Currency strength and stability

4. Labour market statistics

5. Commodity prices

A procurement professional may find stock market data from the security exchange, while most lagging indicators (such as GDP, CPI, unemployment rate, currency and inflation rate, etc) can be found from government statistics data.

Integrative negotiationfocuses onmutual gainand long-term collaboration. It seeks tomaximize joint outcomesand encourages parties to align interests andpursue shared goals. This contrasts with distributive tactics that prioritize individual wins and short-term gains.

“Integrative negotiations aim to create outcomes where both parties benefit. Shared problem-solving, information exchange, and joint goal pursuit are central features of this approach.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.1 - Principles of Integrative Negotiation)

Closed questions (requiring yes/no or factual answers) are best for verifying facts, ensuring clarity and accuracy. Open questions are useful for exploration, while hypothetical test possibilities, and leading steer responses. In negotiation, closed questions confirm details such as prices, quantities, or deadlines, preventing ambiguity in agreements. CIPS stresses using the full range of question types strategically, with closed questions essential in finalising commitments.

In order to answer this question, you should better consider each option:

'Exchange rate' is the value of one nation's currency versus the currency of another nation or economic zone. This is a macroeconomic factor.

'Elasticity' refers to the degree to which individuals, consumers or producers change their demand or the amount supplied in response to price or income changes. This is a microeconomic factor

Consumer tastes refer to the products and services that consumers consciously choose over others. Consumer tastes are so powerful that they can change how businesses conduct their activity. Like elasticity, this is also a microeconomic factor.

Among 4 options, only risk management is the internal factor. Risk pricing is a strategy applied by many companies in the world. To learn how to price the risk, you can read an article from McKinsey: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/marketing-and-sales/our-insights/how-to-price-risk-to-win-and-profit

This is a question that a student met in her actual exam. The knowledge section is unknown.

LO: Unknown, AC: Unknown

Collaborating is both assertive and cooperative. When collaborating, an individual attempts to work with the other person to find a solution that fully satisfies the concerns of both. It involves digging into an issue to identify the underlying concerns of the two individuals and to find an alternative that meets both sets of concerns. Collaborating between two persons might take the form of exploring a disagreement to learn from each other’s insights, resolving some conditionthat would otherwise have them competing for resources, or confronting and trying to find a creative solution to an interpersonal problem.

A supply curve will slope upward from left to right showing more supply at higher prices, as illustrated in the graph below:

A movement along the supply curve will be brought about by a change in price, but a shift of the whole curve will be caused by a determinant other than price:

- The physical feasibility and time and energy required to produce the products

- Technology and innovation

- The objectives of the producers and their future expectations

- Prices of other goods and services

- Government's policies

LO 2, AC 2.2

A useful and simple shorthand for preferred negotiation styles is summarised by four simple descriptor: 'warm', 'tough', 'logical' and 'dealer', which can be applied to describe individuals' dominant preferred style in most circumstances.

Warm - a people person

Tough - a hard-nosed negotiator

Logic - a numbers person

Dealer - a trader who loves bargaining

Strengths, weaknesses of logical style are described below:

Table Description automatically generated

The supplier is using Rational persuasion by providing logical reasons, such as economic conditions and increased costs, to justify the price increase. This approach uses factual information to influence the buyer's decision, aiming to present the price hike as a reasonable adjustment, which aligns with CIPS strategies on influencing tactics in negotiations.

Knowing supplier's fixed and variable costs is beneficial for the buyer in a negotiation. With these insights, the buyer would know the volume at which the supplier reaches break-even points and then offers significant discount due to economies of scale.

Lina’s question seeksdetailed informationabout the supplier’s actions and is aimed at uncovering the root cause or assurance measures. This makes it aprobing question, designed to delve deeper into specifics. Probing is a key technique in negotiations for uncovering critical insights, particularly duringissue resolution or when seeking complianceon performance terms.

An adversarial negotiation style is appropriate when one party has high bargaining power and is focused on maximizing its benefit rather than maintaining a long-term relationship. This approach often involves competitive tactics that leverage power disparities, aligning with CIPS guidance on when adversarial tactics may be strategically used in negotiations.

Distributive approach to negotiation used when the interested parties are attempting to divide something up or distribute something of value, also known as zero-sum approach or win-lose. Win-lose approach is useful when the relationship with the other party (TOP) is short-term and once-off.

The question mentions 4 types of relationship:

Adversarial: Both seek to maximize position at the expense of the other. Almost no trust, communication and cooperation. These suppliers will probably provide non-core products or services with the buyer purchasing them on a one-off basis.

Outsourcing relationship: Use competent suppliers to manage non-core businesses previously done in-house. Require high level of trust and collaboration

Partnership: Both work closely on long term development by sharing information, technology and ideas.High level of trust with the aim to benefit both parties (win-win)

Strategic alliance: Both parties identify areas where they could collaborate to create mutual benefits

Among these 4 types of relationship, only adversarial is once-off. Then it is the correct answer.

CIPS recognises that agreement can be reached without formal negotiation by using alternative influence-based approaches. Accommodating involves one party yielding to preserve relationships or progress. Persuasion uses communication, reasoning, and influence to shape the other party’s views and decisions. Problem solving focuses on jointly identifying solutions that address both parties’ needs. These approaches are particularly useful where relationships are important or power is balanced. Team management, psychodynamic management, and validation of reporting are not recognised CIPS agreement-reaching approaches within commercial negotiation theory. The ability to choose the correct approach enhances negotiation effectiveness and relationship outcomes.

Essentially, for trained negotiators under most circumstances, the physical locations of negotiations and the room layout should not make much difference to the outcomes of the meeting. It is reasonable to assume that most commercial negotiations are based at least initially on a principled- or pragmatic-type approach. It is arguable also that any advantage gained through intentionally creating an uncomfortable environment to put short-term pressure on TOP is likely to be short-lived as TOP will likely reflect on this later and seek means to get even.

Risk management (3) and the stage in the product life cycle (4) are internal factors within the supplier's control and directly influence pricing decisions. These internal factors guide strategicpricing policies. In contrast, price elasticity of demand and environmental legislation are external factors, as per CIPS’s guidelines on pricing influences.

The agency (buyer) has made a concession about the price. Possibly the supplier will request another concession (the salami tactics). To avoid this to be happened, the agency should only allow a concession as an exception, make sure that the concession is documented and only permitted against some exceptional circumstances, and seek agreement to this from the supplier.

LO 3, AC 3.2

In microeconomics, equilibrium price is determined when the quantity demanded is equal to the quantity supplied at equilibrium price in a market, there will be no shortages and no surpluses. If we combine our supply and demand curves on one graph, the point at which they converge determines the equilibrium price. If the price is set above this price and you read across the graph you will see the supply excess demand and there will be a surplus. In order to reduce this surplus, the price will need to fall. The scenario is illustrated in the graph below:

Chart, line chart Description automatically generated

There are multiple sources of divergent positions that can arise in situations where money is exchange for goods and services. There are 2 different types of sources. Those that arise from the content or subject matter of the negotiation (what is being negotiated) and those that arise from the process of negotiation (how it is being negotiated).

Sources of divergent position - the content of negotiation:

Table Description automatically generated

Cultural differences are the source of conflict in the process of negotiation.

Requisition is an internal document raised by user or store to communicate to procurement the need to buy the product or service specified. This is merely a internal document.

Framework arrangement is a rather loose set-up, without any legal standing. It usually occurs when an organisation has decided for itself to limit the number of suppliers it is willing to work with and, through a purely internal process, sets up an approved list of such suppliers.

LO 1, AC 1.1

In most commercial negotiations with monopolistic organisations, one can expect that in general they will have far greater bargaining power - you will need them more than they need you. There BATNA is stronger in the short run, but over time their power can be challenged effectively.

Ways of dealing with monopoly suppliers include the following:

Making yourself an attractive buyer

Seeking out alternatives / substitutes in a private or public manner

Designing out the requirement that forces you to go to the monopoly suppliers, or seek to make the product, or threaten to make it yourself if feasible

Lobbying government or campaigning, as part of an industry or trade body, for a reduction in barriers to entry that support the monopoly

Legitimate power comes from the belief that a person has the formal right to make demands, and to expect others to be compliant and obedient. Legitimate power comes from rules, formal authority, organisation rank, staff grade or official position held. In commercial negotiation, legitimate power can be demonstrated by job title and rank.

LO 1, AC 1.3

Negotiating at the supplier's site can give the supplier a psychological advantage due to their familiarity with the setting. To ensure a neutral and balanced negotiation environment, it’s preferable to conduct negotiations in a neutral location or through structured channels, as recommended in CIPS's guidance on negotiation settings.

Direct costs are expenses that can be clearly attributed to the production of specific goods. These typically include raw materials, direct labor, and other costs tied directly to the manufacturing process. They are variable with production volume and help procurement teams analyze pricing more effectively during negotiations.

In the opening phase, parties should confirm understanding and get the issues on the table.

The testing phase is an information gathering stage where the hypothesis and assumption you have made in the planning stage can be tested or confirmed or disproved.

Opening questions (those that start with 'what', 'how', 'why') are used at the opening and testing stages to uncover needs and underlying motives, and to allow the buyer to get a feel of what is in store in the negotiation.

Probing questions are also useful to check that the supplier fully understand their offering, as well as your needs, and can also be used to communicate to the supplier that you know this category well. These questions are typically useful at the opening and testing stages.

Effective listening is crucial in integrative negotiations as it fosters mutual understanding and helps identify shared interests, leading to collaborative solutions. It enables negotiators to comprehend the other party's needs and concerns fully.

'Supplier may want to encourage buyer's demand': the buyer tends to prefer lower price, if supplier wants to encourage its customers to buy more, it needs to offer discount at bulk amount. So this option is not acceptable.

'Supplier may have high fixed cost - variable cost ratio': Supplier with high fixed cost needs high volumes to break even, but once achieved, it may be able to offer significant discounts for bulk orders

'The supplier may have reached economy of scale': when economy of scale is reached, cost per unit will be minimal which often leads to more favourable price.

'Supplier may need to open new facilities to meet increasing customer's demand': Increasing customer's demands may excess supplier's current capacity. Therefore, supplier may need to extend its capacity by investing more in facilities. To cover these fixed cost investment, supplier may charge higher price.

LO 2, AC 2.1

Macroeconomic factors like inflation, interest rates, and currency fluctuations can significantly affect pricing and contractual terms. Buyers and suppliers must account for these factors during negotiations, particularly in long-term or high-value contracts.

International negotiations often face conflicts due to cultural differences (language, communication style, decision-making norms) and timing/location (time zones, travel, scheduling). These factors can cause misunderstandings or perceived power imbalances. Team size and make-up matter but are manageable internally, while closure processes can be aligned. Recognising cultural and logistical divergences allows buyers to prepare strategies that reduce conflict and promote smoother negotiations.

A probing question seeks deeper information, clarifying specifics beyond surface-level responses. Lina’s question is factual, detailed, and investigative — designed to uncover processes and commitments. Hypothetical questions test options (“what if…”), reflective restate or summarise to confirm understanding, and leading steer the respondent toward a desired answer. Probing is essential in negotiations to validate claims, identify risks, and build persuasive arguments.

Post-negotiation analysis should include performance evaluation, learning outcomes, and a comparison of achieved results versus original objectives. These elements contribute to continuous improvement and future strategy development.

Elasticity refers to the responsiveness of quantity demanded or quantity supplied to a change in price or another factor:

The price of a product can be described as being elastic if a small change in price leads to a big change in demand.

The price of a product can be described as being inelastic if a big change in price leads to a small change in demand.

The formulae of elasticity of demand is known as the following:

Text Description automatically generated with low confidence

Persistent late payment of the supplier’s invoices (A) and Unequal sharing of gains, risks, and costs with the supplier (B) are potential sources of conflict as they create dissatisfaction and imbalance in the relationship. According to CIPS materials:

Late payments (A) can strain the supplier’s cash flow, affecting their operational stability and leading to mistrust in the buyer.

Unequal sharing of gains, risks, and costs (B) can result in one party feeling exploited or unfairly treated, which undermines the collaborative spirit essential for long-term partnerships.

In contrast, requesting early supplier involvement, planning visits, or setting delivery dates are typically part of constructive relationship management practices and do not inherently lead to conflict.

Afixed price agreementprovides stability and predictability. The supplier bears the risk of cost fluctuations, which is especially advantageous in volatile markets. Moreover, it simplifies administrative processes for the buyer over the contract duration.

“Fixed price agreements transfer cost risk to the supplier and enable simplified contract management. This can reduce overhead for buyers and support budgeting accuracy.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.1 - Pricing Models in Negotiation)

Trust is built through consistent communication (e.g., regular meetings) and fulfilling commitments (keeping promises). Coercion erodes trust, while mediation is reactive and not a foundational element of trust-building.

Asking questions the right way is both an art and a science. Ask the question the wrong way, and the other negotiator might act like a turtle, becoming defensive and withdrawing into their shell. Ask the question the right way, and the other negotiator might “spill the beans.”.

Closed Questions: How and when to use them?

Closed questions are those that require a short and focused answer, and are especially helpful in the beginning stages of the negotiation to encourage interaction. They can be used to clarify a point, or to reconfirm certain facts. For example, you can use a closed question to confirm the amount of units the company can produce in a week, or to clarify that what they are really saying is that they don’t feel comfortable outsourcing their accounts to India. Most closed questions only require a simple “yes” or “no” response, so there really isn’t much room for misinterpretation – great for finding out where both you and they stand.

Building rapport sets apositive tonefor the negotiation and encourages openness. It is particularly vital during theopening phase, where first impressions are formed, and trust begins to build. Trust facilitates moreconstructive dialogue, enhances collaboration, and helps parties exploremutual interests.

“Developing rapport at the start of negotiations helps to foster trust and cooperation. This enhances the likelihood of reaching agreements that are mutually beneficial.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 3.4 - The Opening Phase and Relationship Building)

Distributive approach to negotiation used when the interested parties are attempting to divide something up or distribute something of value, also known as zero-sum approach or win-lose. Commercial situations often demand a distributive bargaining approach, if the 'pie' is inherently of a fixed size. In this case, any conflicts must be resolved by sharing it.

In win-lose approach, a negotiator wants to maximise the value obtained in a single deal, the relationship with the other party is not important. Therefore, a strong party may win more than 50% of the metaphorical 'pie'.

It should not be assumed that win-win can be applied to all commercial negotiations, or that win-lose approaches are inherently inferior.

In the scenario, the manager propose to 'split the difference', which means each party will accept some of their demands and concede some. This is known as 'Compromise'.

Many commercial negotiations could be considered routine or just not worth the investment for buyers, and using the phone can make more sense and can be more immediate.

LO 2, AC 2.4

An adversarial style is appropriate when issues are non-negotiable, such as health and safety commitments (D). In these scenarios, compliance is required without compromise, and a firm stance may be necessary. This aligns with CIPS guidance, where adversarial tactics are used in non-negotiable contexts to enforce strict standards.

A useful and simple shorthand for preferred negotiation styles is summarised by four simple descriptor: 'warm', 'tough', 'logical' and 'dealer', which can be applied to describe individuals' dominant preferred style in most circumstances.

Warm - a people person

Tough - a hard-nosed negotiator

Logic - a numbers person

Dealer - a trader who loves bargaining

Strengths, weaknesses of dealer style are described below:

LO 2, AC 2.4

In some markets, suppliers experience peaks and troughs in demand and so buyers can increase their leverage through developing an understanding of how busy their vendor are at particular time during the year or business cycle and targetting at quieter period. Similarly, if a buyer can develop an understanding of supplier capacity and to what extent have they covered their fixed cost, they may be able to target suppliers when their average costs are likely to be lowest. Vendor's average costs will be higher at low and high capacity utilisation.

A picture containing graphical user interface Description automatically generated

Partnership relationshipsare strategic and long-term. They emphasizetrust, collaboration, and information sharing. Unlike transactional relationships, they go beyond price and delivery to focus on joint value creation.

“Collaborative partnerships involve open information sharing and mutual support. These relationships are built on joint objectives, trust, and commitment to long-term success.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.2 - Types of Supplier Relationships)

A push approach typically involves exerting authority or power (1) with the party being influenced generally aware of the influence process (3). This method involves overtly directing or persuading the other party, often through explicit information or directives, as per CIPS’s understanding of push influence techniques.

Foreign exchange rates impact import costs, profit margins, and overall turnover when transactions are conducted in foreign currencies. Understanding these fluctuations allows buyersto anticipate changes in purchasing costs, supporting informed decision-making, as highlighted in CIPS guidance on global procurement considerations.