UiPath-SAIv1 UiPath Certified Professional Specialized AI Professional v1.0 Questions and Answers

In UiPath Document Manager, for string fields, the available options for scoring include:

Exact match: This checks whether the extracted string exactly matches the expected value.

Levenshtein: This method computes the "distance" between two strings, which is the number of single-character edits (insertions, deletions, or substitutions) required to change one string into the other. It is used to assess the similarity between the extracted string and the expected value.

These scoring methods help evaluate the accuracy of string extraction in the document understanding process.

For more details, refer to:

UiPath Document Understanding Framework: String Field Scoring

Levenshtein Distance in UiPath: Scoring String Fields

When designing a taxonomy for document types in UiPath, a key consideration is to structure it in a way that maximizes efficiency and reusability. Grouping related document types under the same taxonomy helps to simplify processing and reduce redundancy. This approach ensures that similar document types are treated consistently, making it easier to apply extraction methods and post-processing rules across different but related document types. Over-segmentation into separate taxonomies for each document type can lead to unnecessary complexity and confusion, making management and scaling of automation workflows more difficult. The goal is to create a cohesive structure that can handle various document types effectively.

(Source: UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining documentation)

Model-based data extraction, often involving machine learning models, is particularly effective for handling complex data structures such as variable-length data or data that spans multiple pages. This approach adapts better to varying formats and can extract information more accurately in such scenarios compared to rule-based or manual methods.

According to the UiPath documentation, the ‘Teach’ training mode is used to improve the model’s predictions for a specific label by pinning it to more communications that match the label’s criteria. This helps the model learn from more examples and increase its confidence and accuracy. The ‘Teach’ mode also allows you to unpin the label from communications that do not match it, which helps the model avoid false positives. The other training modes are not as effective for this purpose, as they either focus on different aspects of the model performance or do not provide enough feedback to the model.

References:

Model training and labelling best practice

Overview of the model training process

Model Training FAQs

Partially labeled messages in UiPath Communications Mining can negatively impact model performance because incomplete or inconsistent labeling creates ambiguity for the model during training. This leads to the model receiving conflicting signals, which hampers its ability to generalize well across the dataset, resulting in reduced precision and recall in predictions. Proper and complete labeling is critical to ensure the model learns accurately from the data

When creating a data labeling session in UiPath AI Center, the key pieces of information required are:

The data labeling session name: A unique identifier for the session.

The dataset: The data that will be used in the labeling session.

For more details, refer to:

UiPath AI Center Documentation: Data Labeling Sessions

The "Wait for Classification Validation Task and Resume" activity in UiPath's Document Understanding Framework is primarily used to halt or suspend the workflow until a specified document classification validation task is completed by a human. This activity is part of the broader workflow to ensure that when automatic classification of documents cannot be confidently achieved, a human-in-the-loop (HITL) approach is followed to validate or correct classifications. Once the validation is performed in UiPath's Action Center by a human, the workflow is resumed, ensuring the proper handling of documents that require review and correction.

This is aligned with the design of the Action Center, which is integrated into UiPath's Document Understanding Framework. When dealing with document classification or extraction confidence issues, manual human validation tasks are often required, which is what this activity manages. It facilitates human oversight, preventing the automation from proceeding with potentially incorrect classifications.

Reference from UiPath documentation:

UiPath Action Center explains how humans are involved in validation tasks to handle cases where classification or extraction needs manual review.

Wait for Task and Resume Activity in UiPath Documentation explains how it waits for a task (such as document validation) to be completed in the Action Center before resuming the workflow.

For more details, you can consult the official UiPath documents:

UiPath Document Understanding Framework

Wait for Classification Validation Task and Resume

This functionality ensures that incorrect data processing due to automation can be caught and rectified by a human, improving accuracy in document handling workflows.

The Form Extractor in UiPath is best suited for documents that have a fixed or non-variable format. This means that documents where the layout remains consistent and predictable, such as standardized forms or invoices, are ideal for this extraction method. The Form Extractor uses predefined templates that map data fields based on their positions, making it highly effective for extracting data from documents with little to no variation in layout. It is not well-suited for documents with significant layout variability, which would require a more flexible extraction approach, such as a machine learning extractor.

(Source: UiPath Document Understanding documentation)

 The ML Extractor is a data extraction tool that uses machine learning models provided by UiPath to identify and extract data from documents. The ML Extractor can work with predefined document types, such as invoices, receipts, purchase orders, and utility bills, or with custom document types that are trained using the Data Manager and the Machine Learning Classifier Trainer12.

According to the best practice, the ML Extractor should be chosen based on the document types, language, and data quality of the documents being processed. It is important to select an ML Extractor that is specifically trained or optimized for the document types that are relevant for the use case, as different document types may have different layouts, fields, and formats. It is also important to take into account the language of the documents, as some ML Extractors may support only certain languages or require specific language settings. Moreover, it is important to consider the quality and diversity of the training data used to train the ML Extractor, as this may affect the accuracy and reliability of the extraction results. The training data should be representative of the real-world data, and should cover various scenarios, variations, and exceptions3.

References: 1: Machine Learning Extractor - UiPath Activities 2: Machine Learning Classifier Trainer - UiPath Document Understanding 3: Data Extraction - UiPath Document Understanding

The main purpose of the Document Understanding Process template in UiPath Studio is to provide users with a ready-to-use document processing framework. It is designed to simplify the development of document understanding automations by offering out-of-the-box features like logging, exception handling, and retry mechanisms. This template allows developers to quickly start working on both simple demos and large-scale document processing projects without needing to build everything from scratch. It is equipped with key components such as classifiers and extractors to streamline document classification and data extraction workflows

Supervised learning is one of the most popular and widely used machine learning approaches. It involves providing the algorithm with labeled input/output pairs, which serve as examples of the desired behavior or outcome. The algorithm then learns a function that can generalize from these examples and make predictions for new, unseen data. Supervised learning can be used for tasks such as classification, regression, and anomaly detection. Some common supervised learning algorithms are linear regression, logistic regression, decision trees, support vector machines, and neural networks.

References:

UiPath AI Fabric - Machine Learning Concepts

UiPath Document Understanding - Machine Learning Models

UiPath Communications Mining - Overview

The Mean Average Precision (MAP) is the primary metric used in UiPath Communications Mining to assess the performance of classification models, specifically for the "All Labels" factor. MAP evaluates how well the model predicts labels by considering both the precision and recall of the predictions. This metric is commonly used in information retrieval systems to provide an overall measure of accuracy across all labels in the dataset.

(Source: UiPath Communications Mining documentation)

The expression does the following:

It uses the subTotalAdditions variable, which is a list of field names that represent the line amounts in the document.

It uses the Select method to apply a function to each element of the list. The function takes a field name as an argument and returns the value of the corresponding document field converted to a decimal number using the CDec function.

It uses the ToList method to convert the result of the Select method into a list of decimal numbers.

It uses the Sum method to calculate the sum of the elements in the list.

It adds the subtotal variable, which is another decimal number, to the sum.

The expression returns the total amount of the document, which is the sum of all the line amounts and the subtotal.

References:

VB.NET - Select Method

VB.NET - CDec Function

VB.NET - ToList Method

[VB.NET - Sum Method]

After the data is extracted using the UiPath Document Understanding framework, it is crucial to handle the data securely and efficiently for further use in other processes or storage. Serialization is often used to convert the extracted data into a format suitable for storage or transmission. By serializing the data, it can be stored in storage buckets (such as cloud storage or a database) and accessed later as needed for subsequent processing. This approach ensures that data is preserved, secure, and available for other workflows or automations.

(Source: UiPath Document Understanding Documentation).

In a Document Understanding Process, particularly when it is in production, it is crucial to manage output data securely and efficiently. Utilizing Network Attached Storage (NAS) and Orchestrator Buckets are recommended practices for exporting result files for several reasons:

Network Attached Storage (NAS): NAS is a dedicated file storage that allows multiple users and client devices to retrieve data from centralized disk capacity. Using NAS in a production environment for storing result files is beneficial due to its accessibility, capacity, and security features. It facilitates easy access and sharing of files within a network while maintaining data security.

Orchestrator Bucket: Orchestrator Buckets in UiPath are used for storing files that can be easily accessed by the robots. This is particularly useful in a production environment because it provides a centralized, cloud-based storage solution that is scalable, secure, and accessible from anywhere. This aligns with the best practices of maintaining high availability and security for business-critical data.

The other options (B, C, and D) include locations that might not be as secure or efficient for a production environment. For example, storing files locally or in a temp folder can pose security risks and is not scalable for large or distributed systems. Similarly, storing directly on a VM might not be the most efficient or secure method, especially when dealing with sensitive data.

In UiPath Communications Mining, over-reliance on the Search feature during the training process can lead to an increase in model bias. This happens because using search-based filtering to identify and label examples might not represent the full diversity of the data. The model could be trained on a skewed subset of the data, causing it to favor certain patterns or keywords, and thus biasing the model towards specific types of data rather than learning to generalize effectively across all data.

Limiting the use of search ensures that the training process considers a broader and more representative sample of the data, which reduces the risk of introducing bias into the model and helps it generalize better to new, unseen communications.

For more details, refer to:

UiPath Communications Mining Documentation: Model Training and Avoiding Bias

UiPath AI Center offers three primary package types: pre-trained, custom training, and fine-tunable models. These are essential for various use cases, from leveraging existing models to training custom ones based on specific data

The RegEx Based Extractor is most effective for documents where data fields follow a strict and predictable format, such as dates, invoice numbers, or specific patterns like email addresses. This method is well-suited for extracting information from structured or semi-structured documents with consistent formats across different documents, making it highly reliable for use cases where patterns are easily identifiable and do not vary significantly.

(Source: UiPath Document Understanding documentation)

In UiPath's Document Understanding Framework, UiPath Document OCR is recommended as the initial OCR engine for processing documents. This OCR option is optimized for extracting text from a wide variety of document types and provides good accuracy with structured, semi-structured, and unstructured documents. It is designed to work seamlessly within the UiPath Document Understanding process and is highly compatible with other UiPath activities and models, making it a preferred choice for starting document processing in most projects.

For more details, refer to:

UiPath Document Understanding Framework: UiPath OCR Engines

UiPath Document OCR: UiPath OCR Guide

To configure the Validation Station as an attended activity in UiPath, the minimum required inputs include the Taxonomy, which defines the structure and fields for data extraction, the Document Path, the Document Object Model (DOM), the Document Text obtained during digitization, and the Automatic Extraction Results, which are the results from automatic data extraction activities that need validation. These inputs allow the Validation Station to properly display and validate extracted data​

According to the UiPath documentation portal1, the Automation Suite installer is a single package that enables the deployment of the full UiPath Automation Platform in the environment of choice, whether on-premises or in the cloud. The Automation Suite installer contains all the components and dependencies required for the installation, such as the infrastructure, the orchestrator, the AI Center, the Action Center, the Insights, the Test Suite, and the Document Understanding. The Automation Suite installer also supports multi-node deployment with automatic scaling and built-in high availability, as well as easy monitoring, configuration, and upgrade options1. Therefore, option C is the correct answer, as it describes the features and benefits of the Automation Suite installer. Option A is incorrect, as it refers to the UiPath Automation Cloud, which is a different offering that does not require an installer. Option B is incorrect, as it describes a manual installation process that is not enabled by the Automation Suite installer. Option D is incorrect, as it confuses the Automation Suite installer with the installUiPathAS.sh script, which is a separate file that is used to launch the installer wizard2.

References: 1 Automation Suite - Overview 2 Automation Suite - Downloading the installation packages

Labels in UiPath Communications Mining are user-defined categories that can be applied to communications data, such as emails, chats, and calls, to identify the topics, intents, and sentiments within them1. Labels are trained using supervised learning, which means that users need to provide examples of data that belong to each label, and the system will learn from these examples to make predictions for new data2. However, not all labels are equally easy to train, and some may require more examples than others to achieve good performance. Labels that have bias warnings are those that have relatively low average precision, not enough training examples, or were labelled in a biased manner3. Precision is a measure of how accurate the predictions are for a given label, and it is calculated as the ratio of true positives (correct predictions) to the total number of predictions made for that label. A label with 100% precision means that all the predictions made for that label are correct, but it does not necessarily mean that the label is well-trained. It could be that the label has very few predictions, or that the predictions are only made on a subset of data that is similar to the training examples. This could lead to overfitting, which means that the label is too specific to the training data and does not generalize well to new or different data. Therefore, labels with 100% precision may still have bias warnings if they lack training examples, because this indicates that the label is not representative of the underlying data distribution, and may miss important variations or nuances that could affect the predictions. To improve the performance and reduce the bias of these labels, users need to provide more and diverse examples that cover the range of possible scenarios and expressions that the label should capture.

References: 1: Communications Mining Overview 2: [Creating and Training Labels] 3: Understanding and Improving Model Performance : [Precision and Recall] : [Overfitting and Underfitting] : Fixing Labelling Bias With Communications Mining

The Present Classification Station activity is used for classification validation in attended mode. It allows the user to review and correct the classification results of documents using the Classification Station interface. The other options are not suitable for attended mode, as they are either used for creating Action Center tasks (A and C) or for training classifiers (B).

References: Classification Station - UiPath Documentation Portal, Document Classification Validation Overview - UiPath Documentation Portal.

In the UiPath 2023.10 release, a key improvement introduced was the ability to record and store failed queue transactions for debugging purposes. This feature helps users by capturing the failure details and making them accessible directly in Orchestrator. The recording of failed transactions is enabled at the process level, within the Video section of the Job recording settings. It is intended to facilitate easier troubleshooting of failed automations by providing insights into the moments leading to the failure, which can be reviewed later for debugging

 Adding missed labels helps improve the label precision and recall in UiPath Communications Mining. Precision is the percentage of correctly labeled verbatims out of all the verbatims that have the label applied, while recall is the percentage of correctly labeled verbatims out of all the verbatims that should have the label applied. By adding missed labels, you are increasing the recall of the label, as you are reducing the number of false negatives (verbatims that should have the label but do not). This also improves the precision of the label, as you are reducing the noise in the data and making the label more informative and consistent. Adding missed labels is one of the recommended actions that the platform suggests to improve the model rating and performance of the labels.

References: Communications Mining - Training using ‘Check label’ and ‘Missed label’, Communications Mining - Model Rating

Unstructured documents are those that do not have a predefined format or layout, and therefore cannot be easily processed by traditional methods. They often contain free-form text, images, tables, and other elements that vary from document to document. Examples of unstructured documents include contracts, agreements, emails, letters, reports, articles, and so on. UiPath Document Understanding is a solution that enables the processing of unstructured documents using AI-powered models and RPA workflows1.

The other options are not correct because they are examples of structured or semi-structured documents. Structured documents are those that have a fixed format or layout, and can be easily processed by rules-based methods. They often contain fields, labels, and values that are consistent across documents. Examples of structured documents include banking forms, tax forms, surveys, identity cards, and so on. Semi-structured documents are those that have some elements of structure, but also contain variations or unstructured content. They often require a combination of rules-based and AI-powered methods to process. Examples of semi-structured documents include invoices, receipts, purchase orders, medical bills, and so on2.

References: 1: Unstructured Data Analysis with AI, RPA, and OCR | UiPath 2: Structured, semi structured, unstructured sample documents for UiPath document understanding - Studio - UiPath Community Forum

When a pipeline is in the running state in UiPath AI Center, the only action that can be performed is to Kill it. This terminates the process immediately, stopping any further processing. Actions like removing or restarting the pipeline can only be performed after the pipeline has stopped.(Source: UiPath Pipeline documentation​

 The Config file in the UiPath Document Understanding Template is a JSON file that contains various parameters and values that control the behavior and functionality of the template. One of the purposes of the Config file is to store the API keys and authentication credentials for accessing external services, such as the Document Understanding API, the Computer Vision API, the Form Recognizer API, and the Text Analysis API. These services are used by the template to perform document classification, data extraction, and data validation tasks. The Config file also allows the user to customize the template according to their needs, such as enabling or disabling human-in-the-loop validation, setting the retry mechanism, defining the custom success logic, and specifying the taxonomy of document types.

References: Document Understanding Process: Studio Template, Automation Suite - Document Understanding configuration file

 The exported data from the UiPath Document Understanding Template contains the extraction results in a JSON format, along with some additional information that can be useful for debugging or analysis purposes. One of the additional information that can be included is the page number from which the field was extracted and the exact position on the page, represented by the coordinates of the bounding box. This information can help to locate the field on the original document image and to verify the accuracy of the extraction. The additional information can be enabled or disabled by setting the IncludeMetadata parameter to true or false in the Config file of the template.

References: Document Understanding Process: Studio Template, Export Results

In UiPath Communications Mining, high coverage ensures that a larger proportion of communications is classified with meaningful labels, meaning fewer communications are sent for manual review and more processes are captured for automation. This leads to more effective automation, reducing the need for human intervention and ensuring that the automation use case is fully realized.

For more details, refer to:

UiPath Communications Mining Performance Metrics: Coverage and Automation

The valid Action Center statuses are:

Unassigned: The action is not assigned to any user.

Pending: The action is assigned and awaiting user response.

In UiPath AI Center, the platform supports several types of machine learning (ML) models, including:

Out-of-the-box models from UiPath: Pre-built models designed for common automation tasks.

Models from UiPath technology partners: External models developed by UiPath’s partners.

Open-source models: Community-contributed models that can be used and adapted for various use cases.

Custom models: Models that users build and train specifically for their projects using their datasets.

This flexibility in model support ensures that organizations can leverage a wide range of machine learning capabilities to suit different automation needs.

For more details, refer to:

UiPath AI Center Documentation: AI Center Models

Machine Learning Model Types: Types of Models in UiPath AI Center

The DocumentUnderstanding ML package is a generic, retrainable model designed to handle various document types that are not covered by out-of-the-box models. It allows for the extraction of data from structured and semi-structured documents by building a model from scratch through training. This package is highly flexible and can be tailored to fit different document formats, making it ideal when specific document types are not pre-configured in UiPath’s out-of-the-box offerings.(Source: UiPath Documentation on ML Packages

The Taxonomy Manager is a tool that enables you to create and edit a Taxonomy file, which is an XML file that defines the document types and fields that are relevant for your automation project1. The Taxonomy file is used by the Classify Document Scope and Data Extraction Scope activities to perform document classification and data extraction, respectively2. The Taxonomy Manager allows you to add, remove, rename, or reorder document types and fields, as well as specify the data type, format, and validation rules for each field3. The Taxonomy Manager also provides a preview of the Taxonomy file and a validation feature to check for errors or inconsistencies.

References:

1: About Taxonomy Manager 2: About Document Understanding Framework 3: Using the Taxonomy Manager : Taxonomy Manager User Interface Description

 A label taxonomy is a hierarchical structure of concepts that you want to capture from your communications data, such as emails, chats, or calls. Each label represents a specific concept that serves a business purpose and is aligned to your objectives. A label taxonomy can have multiple levels of hierarchy, where each child label is a subset of its parent label. For example, a parent label could be “Product Feedback” and a child label could be “Product Feature Request” or “Product Bug Report”. A label taxonomy is used to train a machine learning model that can automatically classify your communications data according to the labels you defined1.

One of the best practices for designing a label taxonomy is to ensure that each label is clearly identifiable from the text of the individual verbatim (not thread) to which it will be applied. A verbatim is a single unit of communication, such as an email message, a chat message, or a call transcript segment. A thread is a collection of related verbatims, such as an email conversation, a chat session, or a call recording. When you train your model, you will apply labels to verbatims, not threads, so it is important that each label can be recognized from the verbatim text alone, without relying on the context of the thread. This will help the model to learn the patterns and features of each label and to generalize to new data. It will also help you to maintain consistency and accuracy when labelling your data2.

References: 1: Communications Mining - Taxonomies 2: Communications Mining - Label hierarchy and best practice

From the provided workflow:

The Assign Status activity sets the variable Status to the value "Approved".

The Check Status activity evaluates the value of Status against defined conditions.

It has branches for "Pending", "New", and "Unknown".

The "Default" branch is triggered if none of these conditions match the value of Status.

Since "Approved" does not match "Pending", "New", or "Unknown", the Default branch will execute.

The Write Line activity in the Default branch outputs "Status not valid." to the Output panel.

 The Reports section of the dataset navigation bar in UiPath Communication Mining allows users to access detailed, quervable charts, statistics, and customizable dashboards that provide valuable insights and analysis on their communications data1. The Reports section has up to six tabs, depending on the data type, each designed to address different reporting needs2:

Dashboard: Users can create custom dashboard views using data from other tabs, such as label summary, trends, segments, threads, and comparison. Dashboards are specific to the dataset and can be edited, deleted, or renamed by users with the ‘Modify datasets’ permission3.

Label Summary: Users can view high-level summary statistics for labels, such as volume, precision, recall, and sentiment. Users can also filter by data type, source, date range, and label category.

Trends: Users can view charts for verbatim volume, label volume, and sentiment over a selected time period. Users can also filter by data type, source, date range, and label category.

Segments: Users can view charts comparing label volumes to verbatim metadata fields, such as sender domain, channel, or language. Users can also filter by data type, source, date range, and label category.

Threads: Users can view charts of thread volumes and label volumes within a thread, if the data is in thread form, such as call transcripts or email chains. Users can also filter by data type, source, date range, and label category.

Comparison: Users can compare different cohorts of data against each other, such as different sources, time periods, or label categories. Users can also filter by data type, source, date range, and label category.

References: 1: Communications Mining - Using Reports 2: Communications Mining - Reports 3: Communications Mining - Using Dashboards : [Communications Mining - Using Label Summary] : [Communications Mining - Using Trends] : [Communications Mining - Using Segments] : [Communications Mining - Using Threads] : [Communications Mining - Using Comparison]

According to the UiPath documentation, a UiPath Communications Mining taxonomy is a collection of all the labels applied to the verbatims in a dataset, structured in a hierarchical manner. Labels are the concepts and intents that you want to capture in the dataset to suit your specific objectives. When you import your taxonomy from a spreadsheet, you need to provide the label descriptions, which are the names of the labels and their level in the hierarchy. Label predictions and entity predictions are the outputs of the model training process, and they are not part of the taxonomy. Entity descriptions are the definitions of the entities that you want to extract from the verbatims, and they are not part of the taxonomy either.

References:

Communications Mining - Taxonomies

Communications Mining - Importing your taxonomy

Communications Mining - Building your taxonomy structure

In UiPath Communications Mining, general fields that are trained from scratch require user-defined inputs and training data, making them highly customizable but dependent on the specific data provided by the user. In contrast, pre-trained general fields are based on predefined rules and training models developed by UiPath. These pre-trained fields offer out-of-the-box functionality and are optimized for common use cases, whereas user-trained fields offer more flexibility to meet specific business requirements.

(Source: UiPath Communications Mining documentation)

When you create a training dataset for document classification or data extraction, you need to split your documents into two subsets: one for training the model and one for evaluating the model. The training subset is used to teach the model how to recognize the patterns and features of your document types and fields. The evaluation subset is used to measure the performance and accuracy of the model on unseen data. The evaluation subset should not be used for training, as this would bias the model and overfit it to the data1.

The recommended split of documents for training and evaluation depends on the size and diversity of your data. However, a general guideline is to use a 70/30 or 80/20 ratio, where 70% or 80% of the documents are used for training and 30% or 20% are used for evaluation. This ensures that the model has enough data to learn from and enough data to test on. For example, if you have 15 documents per vendor, you can use 10 documents for training and 5 documents for evaluation. This would give you a 67/33 split, which is close to the 70/30 ratio. You can also use the Data Manager tool to create and manage your training and evaluation datasets2.

References: 1: Document Understanding - Training High Performing Models 2: Data Manager - Creating a Dataset

To enable a remote knowledge worker to validate the extracted data from documents in Action Center, the automation workflow needs to include the following activities12:

Create Document Validation Action: This activity creates an action of type Document Validation in Orchestrator Action Center, and returns an action object as output. The action object contains the information needed to resume the workflow after the human validation is completed. The input properties of this activity include the action details, such as title, priority, catalog, and folder, and the document validation data, such as the document object model, the document text, the taxonomy, and the automatic extraction results.

Wait for Document Validation Action and Resume: This activity suspends the execution of the workflow until the human validation is done in Action Center, and then resumes it with the updated extraction results. The input property of this activity is the action object obtained from the Create Document Validation Action activity. The output property is the validated extraction results, which can be used for further processing or exporting.

References: 1: Create Document Validation Action 2: Wait for Document Validation Action and Resume

In UiPath Communications Mining, the term Coverage refers to the proportion of messages in the dataset that have informative label predictions. This is an important metric that indicates how much of the dataset the model is able to classify with meaningful and relevant labels. High coverage means that the model is effectively assigning labels to a large portion of the data, which is crucial for ensuring the model’s usefulness in automating communication mining tasks.

For more details, refer to:

UiPath Communications Mining Performance Factors: Model Coverage and Accuracy

Communications Mining: Coverage and Other Metrics

The Solution Architect is responsible for devising a strategy to prioritize processes during the Business Case and Technical Validation phase. Their role involves assessing technical feasibility, scalability, and business value to determine process prioritization.

In UiPath Communications Mining, importing a taxonomy should be done before starting model training. The taxonomy, which includes labels and categories, defines how the data will be classified and structured during the training process. It is essential to have a well-defined taxonomy to ensure accurate predictions and classifications. Importing the taxonomy before training allows the model to learn from it, enhancing its performance. Changes to the taxonomy can be made later, but the initial import is crucial at the start of the training phase to guide the model effectively.

(Source: UiPath Docs on Communications Mining)

In UiPath AI Center, ML Skills can be managed in various ways, allowing users to customize and control how these skills are deployed and used. The management options include:

Creating a new ML skill.

Stopping a deployed skill.

Redeploying an ML skill.

Updating to a new package version.

Rolling back to a previous version if needed.

Modifying GPU usage.

Modifying the use of AI units.

Making the skill public or private.

Deleting an ML skill when no longer needed.

This provides flexibility for both managing the ML infrastructure and optimizing resources in real-time.

For more details, refer to:

UiPath AI Center Documentation: Managing ML Skills

ML Skill Management Options: Managing Machine Learning Skills in AI Center

To ensure the model is trained effectively, UiPath recommends that regular fields be labeled on at least 10 different pages in Data Manager before exporting the labeled documents to AI Center. This helps in providing enough variation and examples for the model to learn from and generalize effectively.

Unattended automation is ideal for tasks that can run independently without human intervention, such as scheduled activities during off-hours. Running reports and emailing stakeholders overnight is a perfect use case for unattended bots, which can execute the process autonomously.